Establishing collective norms
Potentials for participatory justice in Rwanda
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12439766 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Catherine A Honeyman (autor correspondente), Catherine Honeyman, Shakirah E Hudani (0000-0003-2054-5457), Shakirah Hudani, Alfa Tiruneh, Justina Hierta, Leila Chirayath, Andrew Iliff, Jens Meierhenrich |
| Ano | 2004 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-24 |
| Data de publicação | 2004-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1078-1919 • E-ISSN: 1532-7949 |
| Editora | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1207/s15327949pac1001_1 |
| OpenAlex | W1986252854 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 22 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
In June 2002, the Republic of Rwanda embarked on an extraordinary experiment in transitional justice, inaugurating the pilot phase of a new participatory justice system called Inkiko-Gacaca. This article-the result of 8 weeks of research involving interviews with government and nongovernmental organization officials, local judges, and prisoners, and extensive observations of the Inkiko-Gacaca process in several different rural communities-explores the system's potential for healing inter-group conflict through a collaborative process of establishing common social and moral norms. The historical and theoretical background of Inkiko-Gacaca is followed by an in-depth case study of 3 communities. Relating intergroup contact theory to the actual experiences of Rwandans participating in this transitional justice system, we emphasize the need to revise the theory's often-implied assumption of homogeneity in participant perspectives. This analysis illustrates 4 very different levels of trust at which Rwandans participate in the Inkiko-Gacaca system, and the dangers, as well as the positive potential, that this wide distribution of perceptions implies. Ultimately, the research indicates some specific ways in which Inkiko-Gacaca could address the concerns of its most disillusioned participants, to help ensure that its contribution to the process of social reconstruction in Rwanda is a positive one
Citizen journalism · Criminology · Economic Justice · Political science · Sociology · Cambodian History and Society · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Political Conflict and Governance
Healing, Reconciliation, Forgiving and the Prevention of Violence after Genocide or Mass Killing
The limits of post-genocide justice in Rwanda
Determinants of case outcomes in Rwanda's postgenocide gacaca courts
Witnesses to genocide
So long, and thanks for all the
Conflict, Complexity, and Change
Analyzing reconciliation
Producing Expertise in a Transitional Justice Setting
Learning “To Be” Kinyarwanda in Postgenocide Rwanda
Reconciliation through the Righteous
Pathways to trust and caution among South African university students
The Challenging Road to Reconciliation in Rwanda
Proposing a new framework
Rwanda’s Inyangamugayo
Restorative Justice
Carceral urbanism
Justice, healing, and reconciliation
The impact of Gacaca tribunals in Rwanda
Terrorism
Consequences of judging in transitional justice courts
Reconciliation after Genocide, Mass Killing, or Intractable Conflict
From model to practice
Norm Violation and Intergroup Relations
Social Conflict
Generalized Intergroup Contact Effects on Prejudice
The origins and prevention of genocide, mass killing, and other collective violence
Perceptions of psychosocial healing and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa
In Common Predicament
Norms
| Obras citantes distintas | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2004 - 2026 (23) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 22 |