Engaging With Program Adaptations in Evaluation

A Range of Existing Options and a New Opportunity

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12470465
AutoresMelvin M Mark (0000-0003-4545-1553, Penn State University, State College, PA, USA, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume43
Fascículo3
Páginas314-334
Data de publicação2021-08-03
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
EditoraSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10982140211031657
OpenAlexW3192283193
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas34

Premised on the idea that evaluators should be familiar with a range of approaches to program modifications, I review several existing approaches and then describe another, less well-recognized option. In this newer option, evaluators work with others to identify potentially needed adaptations for select program aspects in advance. In describing this approach, I note the general steps involved and present alternative techniques for identifying, a priori, adaptations that may come to be needed. In the final section, I discuss implications of the a priori adaptation planning approach for the fidelity–adaptation trade-off, past criticism of logic models as overly fixed and linear, potential research and evaluation questions, the development of more detailed views of programs in evaluation theory and training, and possible resistance to adaptation planning. Discussion also considers the potential future of program adaptations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

A priori and a posteriori · Adaptation (eye · Criticism · Data science · Epistemology · Fidelity · Management science · Operations research · Political science · Process management · Program evaluation · Risk analysis (engineering · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Psychology