Time to Worry, Mate? The Construction of Maritime Security Perceptions Down Under

Maritime security challenges in the Asia–Pacific are increasingly at the forefront of both academic and policy concerns, both inside and outside of the region. The intense geostrategic competition in the South China Sea partially explains the growing interest, but the attention goes deeper than that. The rise of new maritime powers in the Pacific, as well as increasing concerns over a clash between the United States and China, underscore the burgeoning importance of the maritime Asia–Pacific. While much of the research on Asian–Pacific maritime security focuses heavily on the experiences and strategies of the major powers, it is also important to understand the perspectives and policies of other actors in the region. This article focuses specifically on the maritime security perceptions of Australia and New Zealand: Using interviews with and publications by trans‐Tasman experts, I sketch the dominant threats perceived by the countries in their maritime environments. Important policy conclusions can be drawn from this analysis of perceptions of maritime security challenges Down Under. Perhaps the timeliest policy insight is that as the United States considers whether or not to confront China over its behavior in the South China Sea, it is unlikely to receive full support from all of its mates in the region. The paper also argues that understanding key maritime security challenges – from the pragmatic to great powers relations – requires an openness to understanding how maritime security threat perceptions are constructed by identity and other ideational factors

Business · China · Economics · Economy · Foreign policy · International trade · Maritime Security · Openness to experience · Perception · Political science · Politics · Worry · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Maritime Security and History · Psychology

• Nonproliferation Norms

  Maria Rost Rublee, Gary Bertsch et al.•Nonproliferation Norms•2009

  Incluir item

• The Purpose of Intervention

  Martha Finnemore•Purpose of Intervention•2019

  Incluir item

• Maritime Boundary Disputes in East Asia

  Open Access•James Manicom•International Studies Perspectives•2011

  Incluir item

• The interaction of material and ideational factors in the East China Sea dispute

  James Manicom•Global Change Peace & Security•2008

  Incluir item

• Ocean governance, maritime security and the consequences of modernity in Northeast Asia

  Ciara Wirth•The Pacific Review•2012

  Incluir item

• Law, Force and Diplomacy at Sea

  John C Campbell, Ken Booth•Foreign Affairs•1985

  Incluir item

• What China Will Want

  Jeffrey W Legro•Perspectives on Politics•2007

  Incluir item

• Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East

  Open Access•Roland Dannreuther•Contemporary Political Theory•2003

  Incluir item

• Conceptualising Future Threats to Australia's Security

  Andrew O''Neil, Andrew O’neil et al.•Australian Journal of Political…•2011

  Incluir item

• Diplomatic divergence in the Antipodes

  Richard Devetak, Jacqui True•Australian Journal of Political…•2006

  Incluir item

• China's ambition in the South China Sea

  Open Access•Katherine Morton•International Affairs•2016

  Incluir item