Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Producing Research Syntheses for Decision-and Policy-Making

This article presents and discusses five challenges encountered in conducting a knowledge synthesis on primary healthcare, commissioned by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. These challenges are (1) conceptualizing, defining and operationalizing complex interventions; (2) integrating quantitative and qualitative studies and assessing strength of evidence; (3) incorporating expert opinions and decision-makers’ viewpoints; (4) producing timely results; and (5) presenting the results in a concise yet understandable form. We also propose methods and operational tools to deal with these issues, particularly regarding integration of qualitative and quantitative evidence and incorporation of expert opinions into syntheses. The major challenge of the synthesis was to provide pertinent and useful information for decision- and policy-makers, while maintaining an acceptable level of scientific rigour. This approach seems promising for knowledge syntheses, which sustain a deliberative process that leads to more enlightened decision and policy-making

Deliberation · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Foundation (evidence · Health care · Knowledge management · Management science · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Process management · Rigour · Viewpoints · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science · Primary Care and Health Outcomes

• Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

  Open Access•Ray Pawson, Trisha Greenhalgh et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  Incluir item

• Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence

  Open Access•Mary Dixon-Woods, Shona Agarwal et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  Incluir item

• Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field

  Open Access•Nicholas Mays, Catherine Pope et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2005

  Incluir item

• Evidence based policy

  Open Access•Nick Black, Anna Donald•BMJ•2001

  Incluir item

• A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations

  Peer C Fiss•Academy of Management Review•2007

  Incluir item

• Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence

  Open Access•Simon Innvær, Gunn Elisabeth Vist et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2002

  Incluir item

• The challenge of complexity in health care

  Open Access•Paul E Plsek, Trisha Greenhalgh•BMJ•2001

  Incluir item

• Continuity of care

  Open Access•Jeannie Haggerty, Jeannie L Haggerty et al.•BMJ•2003

  Incluir item

• Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review

  Open Access•David Tranfield, David Denyer et al.•British Journal of Management•2003

  Incluir item

• An Emerging Framework for Including Different Types of Evidence in Systematic Reviews for Public Policy

  Open Access•Sandy Oliver, Angela Harden et al.•Evaluation•2005

  Incluir item

• Evidence-based Policy

  Open Access•Ray Pawson•Evaluation•2002

  Incluir item

• Evidence-Based Public Health

  Cesar G Victora, Jean‐pierre Habicht et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

  Incluir item

• Le pouvoir et la règle. Dynamiques de l'action organisée

  Denis Segrestin, Erhard Friedberg•Revue Française de Sociologie•1994

  Incluir item