Safety Assessment in Child Protection—A Survey Study With Dutch Child Protection Workers
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12570923 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Brenda Erens (0000-0001-5979-3226, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands, autor correspondente), Heike Gerger (0000-0002-7077-658X, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands), Ellin Simon (0000-0001-7134-4239, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-03-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Child & Family Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1356-7500 • E-ISSN: 1365-2206 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cfs.70157 |
| OpenAlex | W7135017282 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
Safety assessment is a crucial part of child protective services to estimate acute and chronic danger in families that are at risk for child abuse in order to determine whether and which steps need to be taken to protect the child's safety. This study aimed to gain insight into the usefulness of the safety assessment procedure at Dutch child protective services (Safe Home) by means of an online survey with professionals. Professionals ( N = 300) working at Safe Home (i.e., medical doctors, social workers and behavioural scientists) completed an online survey consisting of closed and open questions on their used safety assessment procedure. Also, a face validity check of the instrument, supplemented by evidence‐based items to estimate safety, was conducted. Professionals reported a lack of standardization with the current safety assessment. They struggle to estimate acute and chronic danger and miss elaboration and explanation of steps they need to take within the assessment process. In their daily work, they experience a tension between a need for recognizing individual and systemic factors within complex family systems on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the need to simplify the assessment process, which at this moment is too complicated and time consuming. Safety and risk assessment tools need to facilitate child protection workers in their work, aimed to guide decision‐making processes. However, the current safety assessment method of Safe Home lacks standardization. It is of utmost importance to use evidence based, standardized safety and risk assessment tools to aid the complex decision‐making task that CPS professionals face in their casework. The lack of standardization and guidelines poses risks for decision‐making in child protective services, where professionals need to determine the necessary steps to establish safety for the child and family
Child protection · Needs assessment · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Risk assessment · Standardization · Child Abuse and Related Trauma · Child Abuse and Trauma · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Social Work
The association between five forms of child maltreatment and depressive and anxiety disorders
Childhood maltreatment and characteristics of adult depression
Decision making in child protection
Interrater agreement and interrater reliability
Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis
Maltreatment in childhood substantially increases the risk of adult depression and anxiety in prospective cohort studies
Understanding the Risks of Child Neglect
A Systematic Review of the Outcome of Child Abuse in Long-Term Care
Risk and Safety Assessment in Child Welfare
Factors that determine decision making in child protection investigations
A systematic review of the effectiveness of interagency and cross-system collaborations in the United States to improve child welfare outcomes
Issues in Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services
Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection
The next step
Levels of stress and anxiety in child and family social work
Introduction to the special issue on the economic causes and consequences of child maltreatment
Child Protection Practitioners and Decision-Making Tools
Research-based Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |