Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Safety Assessment in Child Protection—A Survey Study With Dutch Child Protection Workers

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12570923
AutoresBrenda Erens (0000-0001-5979-3226, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands, autor correspondente), Heike Gerger (0000-0002-7077-658X, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands), Ellin Simon (0000-0001-7134-4239, Open University Heerlen the Netherlands)
Ano2026
Data de publicação2026-03-11
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoChild & Family Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1356-7500 • E-ISSN: 1365-2206
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cfs.70157
OpenAlexW7135017282
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas41

Safety assessment is a crucial part of child protective services to estimate acute and chronic danger in families that are at risk for child abuse in order to determine whether and which steps need to be taken to protect the child's safety. This study aimed to gain insight into the usefulness of the safety assessment procedure at Dutch child protective services (Safe Home) by means of an online survey with professionals. Professionals ( N = 300) working at Safe Home (i.e., medical doctors, social workers and behavioural scientists) completed an online survey consisting of closed and open questions on their used safety assessment procedure. Also, a face validity check of the instrument, supplemented by evidence‐based items to estimate safety, was conducted. Professionals reported a lack of standardization with the current safety assessment. They struggle to estimate acute and chronic danger and miss elaboration and explanation of steps they need to take within the assessment process. In their daily work, they experience a tension between a need for recognizing individual and systemic factors within complex family systems on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the need to simplify the assessment process, which at this moment is too complicated and time consuming. Safety and risk assessment tools need to facilitate child protection workers in their work, aimed to guide decision‐making processes. However, the current safety assessment method of Safe Home lacks standardization. It is of utmost importance to use evidence based, standardized safety and risk assessment tools to aid the complex decision‐making task that CPS professionals face in their casework. The lack of standardization and guidelines poses risks for decision‐making in child protective services, where professionals need to determine the necessary steps to establish safety for the child and family

Child protection · Needs assessment · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Risk assessment · Standardization · Child Abuse and Related Trauma · Child Abuse and Trauma · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Social Work

  • The association between five forms of child maltreatment and depressive and anxiety disorders

    Open Access•M J Gardner, H J Thomas et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2019

  • Childhood maltreatment and characteristics of adult depression

    Open Access•Janna Nelson, Anne Klumparendt et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•2017

  • Decision making in child protection

    Open Access•Rami Benbenishty, Bilha Davidson‐Arad et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2015

  • Interrater agreement and interrater reliability

    Open Access•Natasa Gisev, J Simon Bell et al.•Research in Social and…•2013

  • Childhood Adversities Increase the Risk of Psychosis

    Filippo Varese, Feikje Smeets et al.•Schizophrenia Bulletin•2012

  • Maltreatment in childhood substantially increases the risk of adult depression and anxiety in prospective cohort studies

    Open Access•M Li, C D'Arcy et al.•Psychological Medicine•2016

  • Understanding the Risks of Child Neglect

    Open Access•Kristen S Slack, Jane L Holl et al.•Child Maltreatment•2004

  • A Systematic Review of the Outcome of Child Abuse in Long-Term Care

    Open Access•Arthur Carr, Hollie Duff et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2020

  • Risk and Safety Assessment in Child Welfare

    Amy D’Andrade, Michael J Austin et al.•Journal of Evidence-Based Social…•2008

  • Factors that determine decision making in child protection investigations

    Open Access•Camilla Lauritzen, Svein Arild Vi et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2018

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of interagency and cross-system collaborations in the United States to improve child welfare outcomes

    Open Access•Ijeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya, Annie J Keeney•Children and Youth Services Review•2018

  • Issues in Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services

    Ronald C Hughes, Judith S Rycusa•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2006

  • Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection

    Open Access•Eileen Munro•Child & Family Social Work•2018

  • The next step

    Open Access•Aron Shlonsky, Dennis Wagner•Children and Youth Services Review•2005

  • Levels of stress and anxiety in child and family social work

    Open Access•P Antonopoulou, Michael Killian et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Introduction to the special issue on the economic causes and consequences of child maltreatment

    Open Access•Kristen S Slack, Lawrence M Berger et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Child Protection Practitioners and Decision-Making Tools

    Philip Gillingham, Cathy Humphreys•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • Research-based Risk Factors for Child Maltreatment

    Open Access•Brenda Erens, Corine De Ruiter et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2022

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae