The Ambiguities of Opposition
Economic Decline, International Cooperation, and Political Rivalry in the Nuclear Policies of the Labour Party, 1963–1964
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12585366 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David James Gill (0000-0001-7486-6593, North-West State Technical University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 251-276 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-04-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Contemporary British History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1361-9462 • E-ISSN: 1743-7997 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13619462.2011.570115 |
| OpenAlex | W1990375161 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 32 |
This article explores the twenty-month period between Harold Wilson securing the leadership of the opposition in February 1963 and the General Election of October 1964. It considers how Wilson balanced his own approach to nuclear weapons with the demands of the party and broader international constraints. As the Leader of the Opposition principally sought to satisfy the needs of the party, which often came at the expense of a more conciliatory negotiating position with Washington. In private discussions with foreign officials, he vigorously contested any future commitments to nuclear sharing, and cast doubt on Britain's future as a nuclear power. International pressures, however, eventually led the Leader of the Opposition to produce a number of subtle caveats to his negotiating position. In contrast to this private and more aggressive style of nuclear diplomacy, Wilson's public position was far more ambivalent and intentionally ambiguous. Claims that he could not make a final decision on the future of the Polaris programme, and thus nuclear sharing, until he was in power provided a convenient way to keep the party united without necessarily committing to cancellation. Wilson's criticisms of the Polaris programme also complemented the Labour Party's efforts to highlight the Conservative government's perceived mishandling of the national economy
Ambivalence · Diplomacy · Disarmament · Economics · Foreign policy · Negotiation · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rivalry · Sociology · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration
A Constructed Peace
The British General Election of 1964
Harold Wilson's Cold War
Wilsonism’ reconsidered
International Factors and the 1964 Election
The Foreign Politics of Opposition
Rethinking Labour's 1964 Campaign
CND's Cold War
It's the Economy, Stupid! Labour and the Economy, circa 1964
In American Hands
Lord Home and Anglo–American Relations, 1961–1963
Britain's power and influence
Trick or truth? The British ANF proposal, west Germany and US nonproliferation policy, 1964–68
Killing the MLF? The Wilson government and nuclear sharing in Europe, 1964-66
The Economic History Review
Nato's nuclear problems
Nuclear Politics
Labour and the bomb
Monkeys, Men, and Missiles
Lyndon Johnson and Europe
Managing the economy, managing the people
Muddling through
The Labor Party's Defense and Foreign Policy
Inventing'decline
Devalued and Dejected Britons
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,08 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |