Institutional process for infrastructural development in Nigeria
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12672575 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Christian Omobhude (0000-0002-5943-3201, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan, autor correspondente), Chen Shih-Hsin (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University), ShihHsin Chen (National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu City, Taiwan) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 223-242 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Progress in Development Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1464-9934 • E-ISSN: 1477-027X |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1464993420937852 |
| OpenAlex | W3046707761 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 40 |
Infrastructural development is characteristically multifaceted, but studies tend to be focused on limited context which has shed more light on structural issues at the cost of increased ambiguity as regards institutional factors that influence infrastructural development. Combining institutional theory and institutional analysis and development framework (IADF), this research studies how institutional factors influence infrastructural development. In particular, it explores three questions: what are the main differences that exist in policymaking processes? How do stakeholders interact in infrastructural development in Nigeria? How can institutions enhance infrastructural development? The findings show that institutional arrangements and legitimacy pressures are the main reasons for organizational passivity which produce under-performing infrastructures. Initially, mimetic pressures influenced infrastructural development practices as companies imitated other company’s structures that were perceived to be beneficial to attain certain goals. However, coercive pressures by government and normative pressures wielded through professional network of actors appear to be more potent institutional instruments for reducing unresponsiveness. We concluded that favourable institutional pressures support infrastructural development practices, which indicates the need for more structured decision-making process based on collective participation of relevant stakeholders
Ambiguity · Business · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economic system · Economics · Government (linguistics · Institutional analysis · Institutional theory · Legitimacy · Normative · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Sociology · Construction Project Management and Performance · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Finance
The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis
An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature
Manufacturing location and impacts of road transport infrastructure
The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry
Understanding Institutional Diversity
Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth
What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward
Oil governance in Nigeria’s Niger Delta
Oil, conflict, and the dynamics of resource struggle in the Niger Delta
The Utility of Combining the IAD and SES Frameworks
Spatial spillover effects of transport infrastructure
The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments
Taking Institutions Seriously
Resilience thinking meets social theory
Political ecology I
The Niger delta
Corporate Social Responsibility and the Rentier Nigerian State
Infrastructure urbanism
Transport infrastructure and tourism development
Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
The Iron Cage Revisited
A Grammar of Institutions
Institutions and Organizations
Institutionalized Organizations
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |