Ideas, Institutions and Diffusion
What Explains Tobacco Control Policy in Australia, Canada and New Zealand
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12677331 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Donley T Studlar (West Virginia University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2007 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 164-184 |
| Data de publicação | 2007-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Commonwealth and Comparative Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1466-2043 • E-ISSN: 1743-9094 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14662040701317493 |
| OpenAlex | W2093109410 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 16 |
| Referências citadas | 24 |
Recent comparative studies find Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to be among world leaders in tobacco control, but the explanations differ. Are cultural or institutional factors, especially federalism, more important in making these three English-speaking countries among the strongest tobacco-control regimes in the world? This study employs data on policy instruments that have been commonly used in tobacco control policy. Paradoxically, the federation that is more fiscally centralised, Australia, has had the most decentralised process of tobacco control, which has allowed it to initiate new policies earlier. Through similar underlying ‘secular morality’ values of public health promotion and diffusion, both within and across countries, similar outcomes are achieved through different institutional processes
Control (management · Economics · Federalism · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess · Public health · Public policy · Tobacco control · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Policy Transfer and Learning · Public Administration · Public Health Policies and Education
What Explains the Paradox of Tobacco Control Policy under Federalism in the U.S. and Canada? Comparative Federalism Theory versus Multi-level Governance
Identifying factors influencing local governments’ adoption of comprehensive smoke-free policies
A call for greater policy and regulatory coherence for an expanding menu of legal psychoactive substances
Bureaucratic Control and Policy Change
Making tobacco consumption a political issue in the United States and Denmark
Gender Diversity and Inclusion in Canadian Security Studies
Federalism and Multilevel Governance in Tobacco Policy
Policy‐making Beyond Political Ideology
Studying Preference Attainment Using Spatial Models
Navigating institutional complexity in the health sector
Women's Organizations, Social Learning, and the Federal State
Lesson-drawing and public policy
State and Municipal Innovations in Obesity Policy
Conceptualizing punctuated and non-punctuated policy change
The role of ideas in policy transfer
Punching Above Their Weight Through Policy Learning
Rich DemocraciesPolitical Economy, Public Policy, and Performance
Rich Democracies
The Politics of Ideas and the Spread of Enterprise Zones
Regulating Privacy
Patterns of democracy
Influencing Policy Transnationally
Policy innovation in the Australian states
State legislation on smoking and health
Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking
The Council of Australian Governments and Intergovernmental Relations
Policy Diversity and Policy Learning in a Federation
Emulation and Policy Adoptions in the Canadian Provinces
Racing to the Bottom? Provincial Interdependence in the Canadian Federation
The Political Dynamics of Tobacco Control in Australia and New Zealand
The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation
The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States
Under Fire. A History of Tobacco Smoking in Australia
| Obras citantes distintas | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,84 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2007 - 2025 (19) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 16 |