He Offered a Prayer for the Flier He Had Just Killed’

The US Army war crimes trials held in Manila from 1945 to 1947 prosecuted around 200 Japanese military personnel for war crimes committed against US prisoners of war and Filipino non-combatants. Japanese defendants attempted to argue, with little success, that the defence of superior orders justified their actions. General Douglas MacArthur (Supreme Commander for the Allies in the Pacific or SCAP) was adamant that superior orders would not serve to excuse alleged Japanese war criminals from war crimes. What is clear from the trial documents and other archival material from Manila is that not all sections of the prosecution agreed with MacArthur’s interpretation of the law. However, it seems as though MacArthur’s pronouncement in relation to the application of superior orders may have had a profound impact on not only the Manila trials, but also with subsequent trials in World War II and beyond. This article explores the various arguments in relation to superior orders emanating from the US Army trials in Manila. The trials in Manila show that the rejection of superior orders as a defence in war crimes offered a reasonable foundation and precedent for how subsequent courts and tribunals evaluated the defence of superior orders within the context of war crimes jurisprudence

Context (archaeology · Criminology · Excuse · International law · Jurisprudence · Political science · Prayer · Relation (database · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Supreme court · War crime · World War II · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Religious Studies

• “Here was Manila”

  Open Access•John Lee Candelaria•Japan focus•2026

  Incluir item