The Warren Commission and the Dons

Distortion in intellectual history is not a direct function of distance from the present. The recent past can create its own problems of perspective. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy is a case in point. Is the controversy surrounding the assassination a worthy subject for an intellectual historian? After all, there is now little serious debate as to what happened in Dallas on 22 November 1963. Mainstream historians regard the case as closed, an issue settled by the exhaustive and fair-minded deliberations of the Warren Commission, whose report, issued in the autumn of 1964, concluded that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, a sad and unsettled individual from a dysfunctional background, had killed the president. However, as we know, the topic remains, almost half a century later, a matter of huge fascination, but only outside the gates of the academy. The study of Kennedy's assassination is now best known to academics as a counterculture, which grossly caricatures the best practices of the academy and where extravagant theories tend to trump sound scholarship, plausibility and common sense. Indeed, this disjunction between the obsessions of amateur historians, known as buffs, and the reluctance of academic historians to lose caste by exploring subjects such as the Kennedy assassination which the wider public—but only the wider public—seems to find worthy of further research and explanation is, as Professor W. D. Rubinstein notes, an interesting sociological and historiographical phenomenon in its own right. Writing in 1994, Max Holland, the journalist and intelligence historian, noted that the history of the Kennedy era was “bifurcated”. For academic historian writing on the Kennedy presidency the assassination is “treated as a footnote or afterthought if it is addressed at all”, while “very few of the more than 450 books and tens of thousands of articles that compose the vast assassination literature published since 1964 have been written by historians.”

Amateur · Historiography · Mainstream · Motley · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · American Political and Social Dynamics · History · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Philosophy

• The Assassination Culture of Imperial Britain, 1909–1979

  Open Access•Simon Ball•The Historical Journal•2013

  Incluir item

• A Rebel in Defense of Tradition

  Casey Blake, Michael Wreszin•The American Historical Review•1995

  Incluir item

• The Mitrokhin archive

  Christopher Andrew•The RUSI Journal•2000

  Incluir item

• After Thirty Years

  Max Holland•Reviews in American History•1994

  Incluir item

• Lord Dacre and the Politics of the Scottish Enlightenment

  Open Access•Colin Kidd•Scottish historical review/ The…•2005

  Incluir item

• Hugh Trevor-Roper

  Michael Bentley•The English Historical Review•2010

  Incluir item