Americanizing Psychoanalysis
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12740596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mitchell G Ash (0000-0002-7033-2073, University of Vienna, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 607-617 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-10-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Modern Intellectual History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1479-2443 • E-ISSN: 1479-2451 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1479244315000402 |
| OpenAlex | W4231460758 |
| Idioma | EN |
The general theme that unites the works to be discussed here is the history of psychoanalysis in America over the past hundred years, particularly during the heyday of its public impact from the 1950s through the 1970s. The broad outlines of this story have been well known for some time. Interesting about the volumes discussed here is the step that each book takes in its own way beyond a narrow focus on Freud and his followers or the institutional history of the psychoanalytic profession to examinations of so-called neo-Freudianism and of the entry of psychoanalytic discourse into American middle- and highbrow popular culture. The question whether, how, or to what extent psychoanalysis became “Americanized” in the course of all this is addressed explicitly in the volume by Elizabeth Lunbeck, and implicitly in the other books under review. In the following I will discuss each volume in turn, pointing to linkages among them along the way
Art · Focus (optics · Highbrow · Literature · Psychoanalysis · Psychoanalytic theory · Sociology · Theme (computing · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Medical History and Research · Psychology
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |