A Matter of Journal Choice
A Conjoint Experiment on Submission Choices of Latin American IR Scholars
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12758347 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Florencia Montal (0000-0003-4902-9106, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, autor correspondente), Gino Pauselli (0000-0002-7497-7354, Princeton University), Priscilla Yamin (0000-0002-9964-3430, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 407-424 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-01-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Studies Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1528-3577 • E-ISSN: 1528-3585 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/isp/ekad025 |
| OpenAlex | W4390839194 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 35 |
This article addresses the underrepresentation of Global South scholars in Global North journals. In order to explore this issue, we conducted a study on the submission decisions of Global South scholars, with a focus on International Relations (IR). We collected novel data on IR scholars based in Latin America and conducted a conjoint experiment on a sample of 446 scholars. Our study provides the first experimental evidence of journal submission choice in Political Science in the Global South. Our findings indicate that both journal attributes and individual characteristics impact the choice of journal, including factors such as language, editorial location, and acceptance rates. This research has important implications for the discipline and for journal editors in the Global North, as it provides valuable insights on how to promote diversity in academic publishing as well as the limits of such strategies
Conjoint analysis · Diversity (politics · Economics · International relations · Latin Americans · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Preference · Publishing · Sample (material · Social science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · International Development and Aid · Law
Conjoint Survey Experiments
Publication outperformance among global South researchers
Where is Knowledge Generated? On the Productivity and Impact of Political Science Departments in Latin America
Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations
Even Today, a Western and Gendered Social Science
IR Theory and the Core–Periphery Structure of Global IR
Latin American IR and the Primacy of lo práctico 1
Who Publishes Where? Exploring the Geographic Diversity of Global IR Journals
Peripheral possibilities
How International Is Political Science? Patterns of Submission and Publication in the American Political Science Review
Segmented Communities in the Global South
Revisiting the “American Social Science”-Mapping the Geography of International Relations
Social sciences internationally
Why Partisans Do Not Sort
Voting in a Multi-dimensional Space
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration Policy Across the Legal/Illegal Divide
Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments
Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis
Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis
International Relations at the End
Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics
The Hidden American Immigration Consensus
Interests, Norms and Support for the Provision of Global Public Goods
Bifurcated Core, Diverse Scholarship
Is International Relations a Global Discipline? Hegemony, Insularity, and Diversity in the Field
Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations
Mind the Gap
Testing the power of arguments in referendums
The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference
Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |