Ethical mental health practice in diverse cultures and races

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12760168
AutoresWinnie W Kung (0000-0001-7083-7162, Fordham University, autor correspondente), Sarah Johansson (Fordham University)
Ano2022
Volume31
Fascículo3-5
Páginas248-262
Data de publicação2022-05-07
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1531-3204 • E-ISSN: 1531-3212
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15313204.2022.2070889
OpenAlexW4229021544
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas42

Drawing from Beauchamp and Childress’s four ethical principles as an overarching framework, integrating them with the NASW’s code of ethics, we examine their intersection with cultural diversity and antiracism, and its implications for mental health practice. We argue that self-determination in collective cultures may involve inclusivity beyond individual clients. Beneficence is culturally defined and evidence-based practices proven effective for some clientele have to be considered together with clients. For non-maleficence, practitioners need to reduce biases and microaggressions to avoid harming clients. Finally, justice is attainable when antiracist approaches are in place and those marginalized have equitable access to culturally-sensitive services

Autonomy · Beneficence · Cultural competence · Cultural diversity · Culturally sensitive · Diversity (politics · Economic Justice · Engineering ethics · Health equity · Mental health · Pedagogy · Political science · Psychotherapist · Public health · Respect for persons · Sociology · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Cultural Competency in Health Care · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice