Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Overcoming One‐Party Dominance

How Contextual Politics and West Virginia Helped Put George Bush in the White House

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12805109
AutoresLawrence J Grossback (autor correspondente), Allan S Hammock
Ano2003
Volume31
Fascículo3
Páginas406-431
Data de publicação2003-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolitics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1555-5623 • E-ISSN: 1747-1346
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00155.x
OpenAlexW2052724688
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas13

In West Virginia it is often said that coal is king. If so, the Democratic Party and organized labor serve as its princess. West Virginia had voted Republican in presidential contests on only three occasions since 1932. If there ever was a one‐party state, West Virginia was it. Yet in 2000, Republican George Bush won the state, thus securing five electoral votes—one more than his eventual margin of victory. This article looks at how this victory came about in light of scholarly questions about how national campaigns select issues on which to campaign in targeted states and how a dominant party can be overcome through such efforts. We propose an answer to these questions that is rooted in the contextual theory of electoral politics and test this theory against qualitative data taken from local and national media and quantitative data in the form of county level election returns

Archaeology · Art history · Biology · Dominance (genetics · George (robot · House of Representatives · Political science · Politics · West virginia · White (mutation · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · History · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Mapping Influence

    Open Access•Kevin Reuning•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2020

  • Designing Social Inquiry

    Gary King, Robert O Keohane et al.•Designing Social Inquiry•1994

  • Citizens, Politics and Social Communication

    Open Access•R Robert Huckfeldt, Robert Huckfeldt et al.•Citizens, Politics and Social…•1995

  • Campaign Dynamics

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey, Thomas Carsey•Campaign Dynamics•2000

  • Information and Elections

    R Michael Alvarez, R Alvarez•Information and elections•1997

  • How does 2000 stack up

    Charles E Cook•The Washington Quarterly•2001

  • Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Gary King•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • The Methods behind the Madness

    Daron R Shaw•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Political Loyalties and Social Class Ties

    R Robert Huckfeldt, Robert Huckfeldt•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996

    Larry M Bartels•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Party Organizational Strength and Public Support for Parties

    John J Coleman•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study

    John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • The 2000 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Gerald M Pomper•Political Science Quarterly•2001

  • Political Context and Attitude Change

    Open Access•Michael Mackuen, Courtney Brown•American Political Science Review•1987

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano0,17
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2020 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae