Use of Template Documents with Guidance to Improve the Quality of Human Subjects Research Protocol Submissions to a Thai Research Ethics Committee
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12807137 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Thana Khawcharoenporn (0000-0001-6093-2887, Thammasat University, autor correspondente), Wilaiwan Chimkhong (Thammasat University), Varanya Roestpricha (Thammasat University) |
| Ano | 2021 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 501-513 |
| Data de publicação | 2021-06-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/15562646211025470 |
| PMID | 34125621 |
| OpenAlex | W3172602825 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 20 |
A pre-post study was conducted to evaluate the utility of template documents specifically created to assist research protocol submissions to a Thai research ethics committee (REC). A total of 172 protocols during the 2014-2016 preintervention period were matched to 172 protocols during the 2017-2019 postintervention period by type of principal investigator and REC review category. The intervention was associated with a significant reduction in initial REC requirement deficiencies in the information sheet and informed consent form, resubmission turn-around time by the principal investigator, and time form protocol submission to REC approval. The most significant postintervention improvements were for information about the consent process and listed risks of study participation. In this study, utilization of a structured protocol template with guidance instructions was associated with measurable improvement in the quality of research protocol submissions and REC review process
Alternative medicine · Computer security · Ethics committee · Human research · Informed consent · Medical education · Medical physics · Operations management · Pathology · Political science · Principal (computer security · Process (computing · Protocol (science · Quality (philosophy · Quality Score · Research design · Research ethics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Psychology
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |