Analysis of fairness and ambition considerations in nationally determined contributions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12823913 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Oliver Herrera (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, autor correspondente), Olga Alcaraz (0000-0003-1648-7805, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya), Bàrbara Sureda Carbonell (0000-0001-8691-3721, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 359-378 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1567-9764 • E-ISSN: 1573-1553 |
| Editora | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10784-025-09670-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4409179061 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
According to the Paris Agreement, climate action must be based on equity. In 2025, countries will have to submit their second nationally determined contribution (NDC) and these will have to provide arguments on how the party considers that its NDC is fair and ambitious in the light of its national circumstances. This article presents a study of the information provided by countries in the fairness and ambition section of their NDC. The use of principles and indicators that are supported by international environmental law is analysed. Countries that use these principles and indicators are also mapped based on their historical emissions per capita and their GDP per capita, grouping them into developed countries, developing countries or countries belonging to the group of least developed countries and/or small island developing states. The study shows that the countries which most use principles and indicators supported by international environmental law are those with the least historical responsibility and economic capacity. It is also evident that the majority of countries use principles and indicators that are favourable to them when justifying their ambition, and that they avoid using those which would argue for an increase in ambition. It is particularly concerning that, in general, the developed countries do not base their arguments on these principles. The authors suggest that, to increase the robustness of the arguments, countries should report using principles consistent with international environmental law and, if possible, standardized indicators should be used to allow comparisons between countries
Biology · Economics · Law and economics · Mathematical economics · Nature Conservation · Political science · Public economics · Sociology · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Ecology
Fairly sharing 1.5
Tempering and enabling ambition
Countries start to explain how their climate contributions are fair
Exploring fair and ambitious mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement goals
Fairness conceptions and self-determined mitigation ambition under the Paris Agreement
Equity in Climate Change
The Paris Rulebook
Ambition and Differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement
Special Circumstances' and the Politics of Climate Vulnerability
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |