Bridging the researcher-stakeholder gap in leisure and tourism
A framework for enhancing the impact of scoping reviews
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12855733 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Najmeh Hassanli (0000-0002-3392-0829, autor correspondente), Trudie Walters (0000-0003-0041-7255), Janine Ashwell (0000-0003-0779-9575) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 211-225 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-01-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | World Leisure & Recreation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1026-1133 • E-ISSN: 2333-4509 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/16078055.2025.2452463 |
| OpenAlex | W4406621129 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
Scoping reviews are instrumental for synthesizing evidence and mapping research landscapes, but effective stakeholder engagement is also essential to ensure their relevance to both practice and policy. Despite its importance, stakeholder engagement in leisure and tourism scoping reviews has been limited. This methodological paper presents the Co-Creation Scoping Review Framework (CSRF) to enhance collaborative knowledge creation. By expanding the traditional five-stage scoping review process to seven stages, the CSRF places a strong emphasis on stakeholder engagement, effectively bridging the divide between researchers and stakeholders. This framework enhances the relevance of scoping reviews for both academic and practical applications, promoting more inclusive research methods, improving knowledge mobilization, and guiding future practice and research. The paper provides detailed guidance on implementing the CSRF, including a step-by-step approach and examples from recent leisure and tourism scoping reviews, demonstrating how the CSRF could have been applied to engage stakeholders and increase the relevance of findings
Bridging (networking · Business · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Tourism · Computer Science · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
Scoping reviews
Enhancing the scoping study methodology
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews
Scoping studies
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
Is Academia a Site of Struggle? A Critical Analysis of Resistance Scholarship in Leisure Studies
A safe space for local knowledge sharing in sustainable tourism
A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals
U.S. wilderness in the 21st century
Leisure studies and occupational therapy in Latin America
Consumer engagement on social media in the sport context
Exploring the dynamics of tourist travel intention before and during the Covid-19 pandemic
Leisure’s relation to older adults adapting to new homes
Messy realities and collaborative knowledge production in tourism
No high hopes for hopeful tourism
Becoming Political
Scoping studies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |