The mismeasure of higher education? The corrosive effect of university rankings
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12858245 |
|---|---|
| Autores | D Robinson (0000-0002-3222-6122, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 65-71 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-05-17 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1611-8014 • E-ISSN: 1863-5415 |
| Editora | I nt er-R es ea rc h (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.3354/esep00135 |
| OpenAlex | W2328316657 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
This paper examines the limitations and biases of world university rankings and asks what drivers explain their ongoing proliferation and popularity. It is argued that rankings are having a corrosive effect on higher education systems, institutions and staff by encouraging policy reforms at the governmental level and a reallocation of resources at the institutional level that may improve standings in the rankings but do not necessarily enhance quality research and teaching. Global rankings are linked to the rise of an international market in higher education, particularly with respect to international students. The author argues that what is at stake in the debate over university rankings is fundamentally whether higher education is to be thought of as having intrinsic value, or whether it is defined narrowly in instrumentalist and consumerist terms
Citation · Higher education · Instrumentalism · Media studies · Political science · Popularity · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Higher Education Governance and Development · Higher Education Learning Practices · Law
New Frontiers in Japanese Studies
International organizations (IOs), epistemic tools of influence, and the colonial geopolitics of knowledge production in higher education policy
Rankings universitários mundiais. Que dizem os estudos internacionais
Open access publishing
Is sustainable development of scientific systems possible in the neo-liberal agenda
Which came first
Global university rankings uncovered
Tenure and academic deadwood
On impact factors and university rankings
| Citações por ano | 0,69 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2013 - 2020 (8) |
| Altamente citado | Não |