On the priority of salience-based interpretations
The case of sarcastic irony
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12859637 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ofer Fein (0000-0003-3877-4143, Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo, autor correspondente), Menahem Yeari (0000-0003-2242-6160, Bar-Ilan University), Rachel Giora (0000-0001-9628-9088, Tel Aviv University) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 1-32 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Intercultural Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1612-295X • E-ISSN: 1613-365X |
| Editora | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ip-2015-0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2330380008 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 49 |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
Results from 2 experiments support the view that, regardless of strength of contextual expectation for utterance nonsalient (ironic) interpretation, (a) salience-based interpretations will not be blocked. Instead, they will be facilitated initially. And, (b) if conducive to the interpretation process, they will not be suppressed, albeit incompatible (Giora 2003; Giora and Fein 1999a; Giora and Fein 1999b; Giora et al. 2007). In Experiment 1, expectancy for an ironic utterance was manipulated by introducing an ironic speaker, whose ironic utterances were prefaced by overt ironic cues, making explicit the speaker's ironic intent. In Experiment 2, expectancy strongly biased via repeated exposure to ironic utterances, was further strengthened by informing participants that the experiment was testing sarcasm interpretation. Long processing times were allowed so as to tap later (suppression) processes. Results from reading times and lexical decisions support the temporal priority of salience-based interpretations, while arguing against both, the contextualist views (Gibbs 2002; Katz 2009) and the Gricean suppression hypothesis (Grice 1975)
Cognitive psychology · Expectancy theory · Grice · Interpretation (philosophy · Irony · Linguistics · Pragmatics · Salience (neuroscience · Sarcasm · Utterance · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Topic Modeling
Antecedent-Contained Deletion
Negation
Vagueness
Politeness
Metonymy
Word Senses
Scalar Implicatures
Counterfactuals
Exhaustivity in It -Clefts
Constraint-Based Pragmatic Processing
Theory of Mind
Language Comprehension, Inference, and Alternatives
Plurality
Genericity
Focus
Pronouns
Verbal Uncertainty
Quantifier Spreading
Presuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation
Reference and Informativeness
Modified Numerals
Distributivity
Adjective Meaning and Scales
Negative Polarity Items
Event (De)composition
Spatial Terms
Ironic Utterances
Metaphor
Turn-Taking
Quantification
Prosody and Meaning
The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics
How language shapes our minds
Examining the emotional impact of sarcasm using a virtual environment
The “default” in our stars
The role of defaultness and personality factors in sarcasm interpretation
Defaultness Reigns
The Role of Defaultness in Affecting Pleasure
Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations in production
Revisiting the typology of pragmatic interpretations
A Linguistic or Pictorial Context
Default Sarcastic Interpretations
Selective View of the Last 50 Years of the Experimental Psycholinguistics of Idiom, Metaphor, and Irony
Experimental ordinary language philosophy
Inappropriate stereotypical inferences? An adversarial collaboration in experimental ordinary language philosophy
Do They Really Mean It? Children’s Inference of Speaker Intentions and the Role of Age and Gender
Speaker-Specific Cues Influence Semantic Disambiguation
Echo and inadequacy in ironic utterances
Default sarcastic interpretations of attenuated and intensified similes
On Our MindSalience, Context, and Figurative Language
On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm.
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs
Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension
Interpreting metaphors and idioms
Lexical access during sentence comprehension
Irony
Negation Generates Nonliteral Interpretations by Default
Expecting Irony
Processing Unfamiliar Metaphors in a Self-Paced Reading Task
Weapons of Mass Distraction
Irony
Comprehension Processes of Verbal Irony
Obligatory Processing of the Literal Meaning of Ironic Utterances
Salience and Context Effects
Are Irony and Metaphor Understood Differently
Understanding figurative and literal language
Resonating with contextually inappropriate interpretations in production
The use of co-textual irony markers in written discourse
Context Incongruity and Irony Processing
Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests∗
Negation in Context
Irony Comprehension in Action
Discourse Factors That Influence Online Reading of Metaphor and Irony
Default Sarcastic Interpretations
Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony
The Modularity of Mind
On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language
A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated
On the priority of salient meanings
Asymmetries in the Use of Verbal Irony
| Obras citantes distintas | 49 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4,08 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2014 - 2024 (11) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 49 |