Manufacturing the Illusion of Epistemic Trustworthiness
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12881663 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tyler Porter (0000-0001-9343-3507, University of Colorado Boulder, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 576-595 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-05-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | EPISTÉMÈ (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1976-9660 • E-ISSN: 1750-0117 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/epi.2024.14 |
| OpenAlex | W4396583077 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 54 |
There are epistemic manipulators in the world. These people are actively attempting to sacrifice epistemic goods for personal gain. In doing so, manipulators have led many competent epistemic agents into believing contrarian theories that go against well-established knowledge. In this paper, I explore one mechanism by which manipulators get epistemic agents to believe contrarian theories. I do so by looking at a prominent empirical model of trustworthiness. This model identifies three major factors that epistemic agents look for when trying to determine who is trustworthy. These are (i) ability, (ii) benevolence, and (iii) moral integrity. I then show how manipulators can manufacture the illusion that they possess these factors. This leads epistemic agents to view manipulators as trustworthy sources of information. Additionally, I argue that fact-checking will be an ineffective – or even harmful – practice when correcting the beliefs of epistemic agents who have been tricked by this illusion of epistemic trustworthiness. I suggest that in such cases we should use an alternative correction, which I call trust undercutting
Business · Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Illusion · Trustworthiness · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Epistemic Injustice
You can judge a book by its cover
Do sincere apologies need to be costly? Test of a costly signaling model of apology
How To Be Trustworthy
Intellectual Virtues
Vice Epistemology
Epistemic Trespassing
The dark side of social movements
Fake News and Partisan Epistemology
Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion
The reasons of trust
The secret life of fluency
Deciding to trust, coming to believe
Trust and Antitrust
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Hostile Epistemology
The Seductions of Clarity
How Quick Decisions Illuminate Moral Character
Vice Epistemology
Beyond Fake News
Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles
Boomerang Effects in Science Communication
What Is Interesting? Exploring the Appraisal Structure of Interest
Imposters, Tricksters, and Trustworthiness as an Epistemic Virtue
Too special to be duped
Do your own research
Attention and weight in person perception
The psychology of the unthinkable
Avoidance of the handicapped
Trust and manipulation in social networks
Climate‐Science Communication and the Measurement Problem
When Corrections Fail
From rarity to evaluative extremity
A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment
Bad Beliefs
Charismatic Leadership and Corporate Cultism at Enron
Trust and suspicion
Trust as an Affective Attitude
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |