Public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12905957 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jorunn Møller (0000-0002-4159-9131, University of Oslo, autor correspondente), David Hall (0000-0003-0215-978X, University of Exeter), Romuald Normand (0000-0002-5482-6540, Université de Strasbourg) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 664-682 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-08-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Critical Studies in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1750-8487 • E-ISSN: 1750-8495 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17508487.2024.2392609 |
| OpenAlex | W4401908843 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 31 |
The meaning of public education is contested. This article aims to understand national policy trajectories of reforming public education and teacher professionalism across three European countries. In the analysis, we will work with Evetts’ and Biesta’s dimensions of professionalism as conceptual tools to trace shifting reconstructions of teacher professionalism and public education. We include an analysis of the national nature of accountability and the status of professional knowledge in education across cases. The following questions are guiding the analysis: (1) What characterizes policy trajectories relating to public education reforms and teacher professionalism across countries? (2) Which convergences and divergences can be identified regarding the interplay between policies about public education reforms and how teacher professionalism is manifested across contexts? (3) What are possible implications of the re-articulation of public education and teacher professionalism in an age of accountability? England, France, and Norway act as cases to illustrate contrasting trajectories in education policy, public administrative traditions and rationales. The analysis shows striking differences between the transformation processes going on as countries have to varying degrees embraced NPM-approaches to educational reforms. We argue that research on public education needs to be examined historically to understand the national status of teacher professionalism
Accountability · Articulation (sociology · Comparative education · Education policy · Education reform · Higher education · Meaning (existential · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Primary education · Public relations · Sociology · Teacher education · Global Education and Multiculturalism · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
New Public Management and the Reform of Education
Teacher professionalism
Sosialdemokratiets tidsalder
The Routledge Handbook of Scandinavian Politics
Teachers and educational policy
Images of Educational Leadership
Changing Cultural Conditions for Knowledge Sharing in the Teaching Profession
Territory, Politics, Governance and Multispatial Metagovernance
Teachers and teaching
Re-professionalizing teaching
Making markets through digital platforms
Whose public, which public? The challenge for public education
Making accountable teachers
What’s wrong with ‘deliverology’? Performance measurement, accountability and quality improvement in English secondary education
Vernacular globalisations
Constructions of professionalism and the democratic mandate in education A discourse analysis of Norwegian public policy documents
Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context
Right‐wing populism and education
Modernising education
Caesars and Rubicon
Education, Measurement and the Professions
Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research
The neoliberal cascade and education
Reforming governance through policy instruments
A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |