AidToo
Social Media Spaces and the Transformation of the Reporting of Aid Scandals in 2018
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12909596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Glenda Cooper (0000-0003-2367-8626, City, University of London, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 747-766 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journalism Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1751-2786 • E-ISSN: 1751-2794 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2020.1851611 |
| OpenAlex | W3108303683 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 29 |
In 2018, sexual abuse scandals concerning Oxfam GB and Save the Children UK, which had been known about for some years in the industry, finally received widespread coverage. Applying Greer and McLaughlin’s [Greer, C., and E. McLaughlin. 2017. “Theorizing Institutional Scandal and the Regulatory State.” Theoretical Criminology 21 (2): 112–132. doi:10.1177/1362480616645648] scandal model and building on Langer and Gruber’s [Langer, A. I., and J. B. Gruber. 2020. “Political Agenda Setting in the Hybrid Media System: Why Legacy Media Still Matter a Great Deal.” The International Journal of Press/Politics. doi:10.1177/1940161220925023] work on agenda setting in a hybrid media system this paper uses in-depth interviews with whistleblowers, legacy media journalists, and those who created alternative media spacesto analyse changing aid-journalism relationships. The findings suggest the scandals were previously kept out of the public domain for several reasons: aid agencies’ use of deflective media strategies and legal threats; fears by whistleblowers that such stories could assist the conservative media’s anti-aid agenda; and unsuccessful approaches to liberal media outlets. The move from latency to amplification came about because of investigations by legacy media journalists, but also media spaces such as WhatsApp and the Fifty Shades of Aid Facebook group. These spaces allowed women to share stories and form connections and. The paper examines the transformative the interplay of legacy and social media in a hybrid system and argues for the consideration of closed as well as open social media spaces when considering the process of scandalisation
Alternative media · Journalism · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social media · Sociology · Transformative learning · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Título indisponível
Framing Scandals
Whose Lives Count
InterViews
Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge
Discursive Power in Contemporary Media Systems
Political Agenda Setting in the Hybrid Media System
Someone’s been in the house
Smut Goes Corporate
A group that’s just women for women”
The cultural dimensions of online communication
MeToo, popular feminism and the news
Theorizing institutional scandal and the regulatory state
Two Faces of Media Attention
Notes on Scandal and the Watergate Legacy
What is News
What Is News? Galtung and Ruge revisited
Donor Power and the News
Foundation Funding and the Boundaries of Journalism
Scandal and Silence. Media responses to presidential misconduct
The Nonlinear Effect of Information on Political Attention
Digital Network Repertoires and Organizational Hybridity
It Takes Two to Blow the Whistle
The Structure of Foreign News
Scandal and Media in the United Kingdom
Account Episodes
Shifting Boundaries of Public and Private Life
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,75 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |