Revisiting women’s entrepreneurship

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study women’s entrepreneurship from the family-firm context and radical subjectivist (RS) economics. While women’s entrepreneurship is a long-standing topic of research interest, there have been calls for more theory-oriented research and research which takes context factors in women’s entrepreneurship seriously. The paper responds to this by using an RS’s view of economics as a theoretical lens to consider women’s entrepreneurship in family firms. Design/methodology/approach – The paper briefly reviews the potential of the family-firm context for examining women’s entrepreneurship in a non-reductive fashion, then outlines radical subjectivism (RS). The three main elements of RS’s “entrepreneurial imagination” are explained, then linked with other theories of family-firm behaviour and applied to casework on women entrepreneurs in family firms. Findings – Each element of the entrepreneurial imagination, empathy, modularity and self-organization, generates new research questions which contest previous apparently settled views about women entrepreneurs. Protocols for investigating the questions are suggested. The third element, self-organization, while more difficult to operationalize for empirical testing, suggests how women’s entrepreneurship might generate new industries. Research limitations/implications – While this is primarily a conceptual study, its case studies invite further exploration of both women entrepreneurs and family firms. The RS perspective could also increase understanding of shared leadership and innovation in family firms. Specific research questions and protocols for investigating them are offered. Practical implications – Insights from the research have practical implications for entrepreneurship education, for understanding entrepreneurship at the level of society, the firm and the individual. Social implications – The importance of both family firms and women entrepreneurs to society makes it important to understand both of them better. The RS perspective can help. Originality/value – The paper highlights the value of combining attention to entrepreneurial context (family firms) and theory (RS) to reinvigorate some old research questions about women entrepreneurs. The combination of family firms and RS is also novel

Business · Context (archaeology · Economics · Empirical research · Entrepreneurship · Epistemology · Operationalization · Political science · Positive economics · Public relations · Sociology · Corporate Finance and Governance · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Family Business Performance and Succession · Psychology · Social Psychology · Marketing

• A legacy of attention to embeddedness in gendered institutions

  Open Access•Karen D Hughes, Jennifer E Jennings•International Journal of Gender…•2020

  Incluir item

• The Legacy of Marx

  Cliff Slaughter•Marxism, Ideology and Literature•1980

  Incluir item

• Women's Entrepreneurship

  Open Access•Candida G Brush, Patricia G Greene•Wiley Encyclopedia of Management•2015

  Incluir item

• Entrepreneurship

  Open Access•Murray B Low, Ian C Macmillan•Journal of Management•1988

  Incluir item

• A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms

  Open Access•Timothy G Habbershon, Mary L Williams•Family Business Review•1999

  Incluir item

• The Discovery of Grounded Theory

  Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  Incluir item

• Men as Managers, Managers as Men

  David Collinson, J Hearn•Men as Managers, Managers as Men•1996

  Incluir item

• Discovery and the Capitalist Process

  Humberto Barreto, Israel M Kirzner et al.•Southern Economic Journal•1986

  Incluir item

• Entrepreneurship, Economic Growth and Public Policy

  Open Access•Zoltan J Acs, László Szerb•Small Business Economics•2007

  Incluir item

• The Psychological Basis of Opportunity Identification

  Open Access•Connie Marie Gaglio, Jerome A Katz•Small Business Economics•2001

  Incluir item

• Critical yet invisible

  Open Access•Kate Lewis, Claire Massey•International Journal of Gender…•2011

  Incluir item

• Work and Employment in Small Businesses

  Open Access•Susan Baine, Susan Baines et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2000

  Incluir item

• The Years of High Theory

  Joan Robinson, G L S Shackle•The Philosophical Quarterly•1968

  Incluir item

• Imagination and the Nature of Choice

  Frederick G Hay, George L S Shackle•The Economic Journal•1980

  Incluir item

• Capital and its Structure

  C A Blyth, Conrad Blyth et al.•The Economic Journal•1956

  Incluir item

• The Market as an Economic Process

  Terence Hutchison, Ludwig M Lachmann•The Economic Journal•1987

  Incluir item

• Basics of Qualitative Research

  Carolyn Ellis, Anselm Strau et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  Incluir item

• Doing Gender, Doing Entrepreneurship

  Open Access•Attila Bruni, Silvia Gherardi et al.•Gender Work and Organization•2004

  Incluir item

• Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists

  Open Access•Anselm L Strau, Anselm L Strauss•Qualitative Analysis for Social…•1987

  Incluir item

• The Legacy of Max Weber

  W M Walker, Wayne Walker et al.•British Journal of Sociology•1971

  Incluir item

• Configuring the User as Everybody

  Open Access•Nelly Oudshoorn, Els Rommes et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2004

  Incluir item

• Managing Technology in Society

  Charles Jacobson, Charles E Jacobson et al.•Technology and Culture•1997

  Incluir item