Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Intellectual property policies for solar geoengineering

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12929259
AutoresJesse L Reynolds (0000-0002-0624-5741, Utrecht University, autor correspondente), Jorge L Contreras (0000-0002-7899-3060, University of Utah), Joshua D Sarnoff (0000-0002-1374-3861, DePaul University)
Ano2018
Volume9
Fascículo2
Data de publicação2018-02-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/wcc.512
OpenAlexW2787242711
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas7

Governance of solar geoengineering is important and challenging, with particular concern arising from commercial actors’ involvement. Policies relating to intellectual property, including patents and trade secrets, and to data access will shape private actors’ behavior and regulate access to data and technologies. There has been little careful consideration of the possible roles of and interrelationships among commercial actors, intellectual property, and intellectual property policy. Despite the current low level of commercial activity and intellectual property rights in this domain, we expect both to grow as research and development continue. Given the public good nature of solar geoengineering, the relationship between the public and private sectors would likely assume a procurement structure. Innovative policy approaches to intellectual property and data access that are specific to solar geoengineering are warranted. These current circumstances also present opportunities for the development of policy and norms that might soon be lost. We consider some possible approaches, and recommend a bottom‐up, primarily nonstate, voluntary “research commons” for patents and data that are related to solar geoengineering. This would facilitate information sharing and limit data fragmentation and trade secrecy. It would also provide an incentive for commons members to pledge to limit some forms of intellectual property acquisition and to assure access on reasonable terms, thereby limiting the need for enforcement. This should help reduce downstream barriers to innovation and to encourage the potential development of technologies at reasonable cost. Such a research commons might also catalyze the adoption of best practices in research and development. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Private Governance of Climate Change Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice

Business · Commons · Corporate governance · Economics · Enforcement · Incentive · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Political science · Property rights · Public domain · Public relations · Secrecy · Transparency (behavior · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Law · Space exploration and regulation

  • The Ethics of Geoengineering

    Open Access•Augustine Pamplany, Bert Gordijn et al.•Science and Engineering Ethics•2020

  • A negative dialectics of climate change destruction

    Open Access•Tracey Skillington•Irish Journal of Sociology•2024

  • The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering

    Open Access•Duncan P Mclaren, Olaf Corry•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2021

  • The Political Economy of Geoengineering as Plan B

    R Gunderson, Diana Stuart et al.•New Political Economy•2018

  • Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment

    Open Access•Wake Smith, Gernot Wagner•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • How should we ask questions about the social status of climate change knowledge

    Open Access•Anita Engels•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2019

  • The private sector to the rescue? Analysis of a hypothetical scenario of SG deployment

    Open Access•Mariia Belaia, Amanda Borth et al.•Futures•2021

  • Materialized ideology and environmental problems

    Open Access•R Gunderson, Diana Stuart et al.•European Journal of Social Theory•2020

  • Earth system interventions as technologies of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Jesse L Reynolds•Environmental Innovation and…•2021

  • The Oxford Principles

    Open Access•Steve Rayner, Clare Heyward et al.•Climatic Change•2013

Obras citantes distintas9
Citações por ano1,13
Intervalo de citações2018 - 2024 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 8
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae