Intellectual property policies for solar geoengineering
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12929259 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jesse L Reynolds (0000-0002-0624-5741, Utrecht University, autor correspondente), Jorge L Contreras (0000-0002-7899-3060, University of Utah), Joshua D Sarnoff (0000-0002-1374-3861, DePaul University) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-02-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1757-7780 • E-ISSN: 1757-7799 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/wcc.512 |
| OpenAlex | W2787242711 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
Governance of solar geoengineering is important and challenging, with particular concern arising from commercial actors’ involvement. Policies relating to intellectual property, including patents and trade secrets, and to data access will shape private actors’ behavior and regulate access to data and technologies. There has been little careful consideration of the possible roles of and interrelationships among commercial actors, intellectual property, and intellectual property policy. Despite the current low level of commercial activity and intellectual property rights in this domain, we expect both to grow as research and development continue. Given the public good nature of solar geoengineering, the relationship between the public and private sectors would likely assume a procurement structure. Innovative policy approaches to intellectual property and data access that are specific to solar geoengineering are warranted. These current circumstances also present opportunities for the development of policy and norms that might soon be lost. We consider some possible approaches, and recommend a bottom‐up, primarily nonstate, voluntary “research commons” for patents and data that are related to solar geoengineering. This would facilitate information sharing and limit data fragmentation and trade secrecy. It would also provide an incentive for commons members to pledge to limit some forms of intellectual property acquisition and to assure access on reasonable terms, thereby limiting the need for enforcement. This should help reduce downstream barriers to innovation and to encourage the potential development of technologies at reasonable cost. Such a research commons might also catalyze the adoption of best practices in research and development. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Private Governance of Climate Change Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Business · Commons · Corporate governance · Economics · Enforcement · Incentive · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Political science · Property rights · Public domain · Public relations · Secrecy · Transparency (behavior · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Law · Space exploration and regulation
The Ethics of Geoengineering
A negative dialectics of climate change destruction
The politics and governance of research into solar geoengineering
The Political Economy of Geoengineering as Plan B
Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment
How should we ask questions about the social status of climate change knowledge
The private sector to the rescue? Analysis of a hypothetical scenario of SG deployment
Materialized ideology and environmental problems
Earth system interventions as technologies of the Anthropocene
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,13 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2018 - 2024 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |