Universalism versus residualism

This article examines the past, present and future of income maintenance schemes in Korea. Historically, income security schemes have been built on the idea of work-centred social insurance supplemented by social assistance. This approach was based on the premise of full employment. While current schemes have achieved institutional completeness and have contributed to alleviating poverty and inequality, they have exhibited limitations in responding to the qualitative shifts of capitalism, leading to welfare blind spots. Various alternatives have been proposed, such as universal basic income (UBI), which aims for equality, and residual Safety Income (SI), which aims for efficiency. The objective of this study is to validate the effects of basic income proposals and SI as alternative income maintenance schemes emerging in Korea. We simulated and compared the poverty alleviation and income redistribution effects of the two alternatives using data from the Survey of Household Finances and Living Conditions (2019~2021). The effects of poverty alleviation and income distribution were determined by analysing the hypothetical changes in absolute and relative poverty rates, as well as the Gini coefficient. The efficiency of benefits was assessed as the ratio of the amount used to reduce the poverty gap out of the total benefit amount. The study found that while SI appeared cost-effective in addressing absolute poverty, UBI was also effective in addressing relative poverty and income inequality

Demographic economics · Development economics · Distribution (mathematics · Economic growth · Economic inequality · Economics · Extreme poverty · Geography · Gini coefficient · Household income · Income distribution · Inequality · Labour economics · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Public economics · Social security · Universalism · Welfare · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Mathematics · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Social Policy and Reform Studies

• Poverty and social security in South Korea

  Marco Pomati, JOANNA MACK•Journal of Poverty and Social…•2024

  Incluir item

• The Precariat

  Open Access•Guy Standing•The Precariat•2011

  Incluir item

• Capital in the Twenty-First Century

  Thomas Piketty•Capital in the Twenty-First Century•2014

  Incluir item

• Parents' Incomes and Children's Outcomes

  Randall Akee, Randall K Q Akee et al.•American Economic Journal Applied…•2010

  Incluir item

• The Rise of the 'Just-in-Time Workforce'

  Open Access•Valerio De Stefano•SSRN Electronic Journal•2015

  Incluir item

• Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity

  Anneli Anttonen, Liisa Häikiö et al.•Welfare state, universalism and…•2012

  Incluir item

• Give a Man a Fish. Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution

  Sarah C White•The Journal of Development Studies•2016

  Incluir item

• Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism

  Anne Case, Angus Deaton•Deaths of Despair and the Future…•2020

  Incluir item

• Global Inequality

  Branko Milanovic•Global Inequality•2016

  Incluir item

• Universal Basic Income is affordable and feasible

  Open Access•Howard Reed, Matthew Thomas Johnson et al.•Journal of Poverty and Social…•2023

  Incluir item

• Young, successful, precarious? Precariousness at the entry stage of employment careers in Germany

  Open Access•Stefan Stuth, Kerstin Jahn•Journal of Youth Studies•2019

  Incluir item

• The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality

  Walter Korpi, Joakim Palme•American Sociological Review•1998

  Incluir item

• Precarious Work, Insecure Workers

  Open Access•A L Kalleberg•American Sociological Review•2009

  Incluir item