Explaining Thailand's Politicised Covid-19 Containment Strategies
Securitisation, Counter-Securitisation, and Re-Securitisation
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12952829 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Angelyn Dela Cruz (0000-0002-8513-6542, Chiang Mai University), Ta‐Wei Chu (0000-0003-2124-6424, Chiang Mai University, autor correspondente), Sung Jae Lee (0000-0002-8094-3740, Chiang Mai University), Chuenthip Nithimasarad (Chiang Mai University) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 378-398 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-05-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1868-1034 • E-ISSN: 1868-4882 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/18681034221099303 |
| OpenAlex | W4229450934 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
We examine the Thai government's politicised COVID-19 containment strategies, which have been challenged by Thai protesters. Although we use securitisation theory as an explanatory framework, we argue that researchers using this theory can explain the issues only if they simultaneously use social-conflict theory to explain the interactions between securitising actors and their audiences. By supplementing securitisation theory with social-conflict theory, we have found that the roles of securitising actors and audiences are not fixed. In our case study of Thailand, the Thai government and protesters have played two roles simultaneously: the role of a securitising actor and the role of an audience. This finding suggests that successful securitisation is impermanent; that is, it is subject to change over time. Securitisation may be successful, but the success can only be temporary because as new actors or resources enter the picture, the previously successful securitisation will, at some point, diminish
Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Public relations · Securitization · Sociology · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Global Security and Public Health · Peacebuilding and International Security
The Securitization of Migration
Security in Translation
Security and the Environment
Security
Cambodia’s hegemonic-party system
Faction Politics in an Interrupted Democracy
Beyond securitization
The political economy of non-traditional security
Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? Towards a just securitization theory
Agents without agency
The politics of securitization and the Muhammad cartoon crisis
The Unlikely Securitizer
From securitization moves to positive outcomes
Securitization and counter-securitization in Afghanistan
Non-traditional security and infectious diseases in Asean
Avian influenza, ‘viral sovereignty’, and the politics of health security in Indonesia
Asean and the securitization of transnational crime in Southeast Asia
Securitization, Frankenstein's Monster and Malaysian education
The securitisation of avian influenza
Sovereignty, intervention, and social order in revolutionary times
Thailand’s Thwarted Democratization
Thailand in 2011
Thailand in 2019
Thailand in 2020
Explaining the failure of the Asean economic community
Myanmar’s way to democracy and the limits of the 2015 elections
Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Suharto Indonesia
Regulatory Regionalism and the Dynamics of Territorial Politics
The Politics and Governance of Non-Traditional Security1
Theorizing the image for Security Studies
Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization
The Three Faces of Securitization
Towards a Theory of Securitization
The Securitization of Transnational Labor Migration
The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration
(Post-)colonial state-building and state failure in East Timor
The Resilience of Monarchised Military in Thailand
The Political Economy of Myanmar's Transition
Thaksin's populism
Beyond Hybridity to the Politics of Scale
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |