Rethinking the Structural Prevention of Mass Atrocities

Interest amongst scholars and policy decision-makers in the prevention of genocide and other mass atrocities has grown in recent years. Despite this, many have overlooked problems inherent in the commonly accepted notion of prevention. Crystalized in the Carnegie Commission’s 1997 report, ‘Preventing Deadly Conflict’, prevention has typically been understood in two parts, one addressing impending cases of violence (direct prevention) and the other focusing on the underlying causes of violence (structural prevention). The concept of structural prevention is especially problematic. Commonly defined as the identification and addressing of ‘root causes’, this conceptualisation contains at least two limitations: first, there is an implicit assumption that root causes lead inevitably to violence, and second, there has been a tendency for international actors to decide, in general and global terms, what counts as root causes and how to ameliorate them, downplaying the role of local contexts and overlooking the preventive work of local and national actors. This article argues that the concept of structural prevention needs broadening to incorporate an understanding of the dynamic interaction between the risk that root causes pose, and locally-based mitigation factors that foster resilience. Effective long-term prevention should be based – not only on identifying and ameliorating negative characteristics in countries at risk – but also on contributing to the complex management of diversity. While this makes intuitive sense – and may in fact reflect the reality of how much preventive work is done – such an approach has not hitherto been reflected in conceptual understandings of prevention adopted by the United Nations, as well as academic researchers

Commission · Crime prevention · Criminology · Diversity (politics · Genocide · Human rights · Law and economics · Poison control · Political science · Public relations · Responsibility to Protect · Root (linguistics · Root cause · Sociology · Engineering · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Global Security and Public Health · Health and Conflict Studies · Law · Medicine

• Prevention as a norm cluster? Mapping China's contestation on atrocity prevention

  Open Access•Qiaochu Zhang•International Affairs•2024

  Incluir item

• An international responsibility to develop in order to protect? A responsibility too far

  Open Access•Adrian Gallagher•Journal of International…•2022

  Incluir item

• Evaluating the United Nation’s Agenda for Atrocity Prevention

  Open Access•Cecilia Jacob•Politics and Governance•2015

  Incluir item

• Understanding Mass Atrocity Prevention during Periods of Democratic Transition

  Open Access•Stephen Mcloughlin•Politics and Governance•2015

  Incluir item

• The Responsibility to Protect

  Open Access•Adrian Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson et al.•Global Responsibility to Protect•2023

  Incluir item

• Christian-Muslim Relations in Africa

  Leonardo A Villalon, Lissi Rasmussen•African Studies Review•1995

  Incluir item