Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Bisexual desires for more than one gender as a challenge to normative relationship ideals

Dados Bibliográficos

ID12978697
AutoresAnnukka Lahti (0000-0002-2613-933X, University of Jyväskylä, autor correspondente)
Ano2018
Volume9
Fascículo2
Páginas132-147
Data de publicação2018-02-21
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPsychology and Sexuality (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1941-9902 • E-ISSN: 1941-9899
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19419899.2018.1441896
OpenAlexW2794436878
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas56

Normative western understandings of intimate relationships continue to draw upon the discourses of romantic love and the ideal of finding ‘the one’ who meets all our romantic and sexual needs. As desire is not sexually or emotionally exclusive, even people in normative relationships have to make sense of desires beyond the monogamous ideal. Bisexual people engage in these negotiations from a challenging cultural position. As a desire for more than one gender, bisexuality is persistently culturally associated with wavering desire, promiscuity and multiple partners. In light of these cultural conditions, I explore how Finnish bisexual women – and their (ex-)partners of various genders who do not identify as bisexual – negotiate desires that exceed the boundaries of normative relationships, such as attraction to ‘someone else’. I draw on the follow-up interviews of a longitudinal interview set conducted in 2005 and 2014–2015. The majority of the interviewed bisexual women and their (ex-)partners lived in monogamous long-term relationships. Yet women’s bisexuality often brought the monogamous norm under explicit negotiation. In many cases, bisexuality as a culturally ‘weak’ identity did not offer a solid frame for women to interpret their desires for people of more than one gender. The notion of bisexuality highlights the excess of sexuality beyond any normative relationship, but makes bisexual women especially vulnerable to stigma. The negotiations around women’s bisexual desires, however, broadened the participants’ (normative) ideas of relationships, and made space for women’s bisexuality in their monogamous relationships

Developmental psychology · Epistemology · Normative · Normative social influence · LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology

  • Bisexuality in Europe

    Emiel Maliepaard, Renate Baumgartner•Bisexuality in Europe•2020

  • “We don’t Have to Live in Such a Constrained World”

    Open Access•Panteá Farvid, Tara Pond et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•2026

  • “To be professional, it isn't necessarily our full selves”

    Open Access•Jules L Madzia•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • Bisexual erasure and homophobia

    L Constantin Wurthmann, Alberto López Ortega•European Journal of Politics and…•2024

  • Quality of Life, Life Satisfaction, and Sexual Agency Among Plurisexual People with Different Sexual Identities in Sweden

    Open Access•Amanda Klysing, Benjamin Claréus et al.•Journal of Bisexuality•2025

  • Too much? Excessive sexual experiences in bisexual women’s life stories

    Open Access•Annukka Lahti•Subjectivity•2017

  • Families We Choose

    Jerry Floersch, Kath Weston•Families We Choose•1997

  • Exploring a Remembering Crisis

    Elena Trivelli•Affective Methodologies•2015

  • The Power of Feelings

    Nancy J Chodorow, Nancy Chodorow•Power of Feelings•2017

  • Doing Qualitative Research Differently

    W Hollway, Tony Jefferson•Doing Qualitative Research…•2000

  • The Importance of Disappointment

    Ian Craib•Importance of Disappointment•2002

  • Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction

    Gail Jefferson•Pragmatics & Beyond New Series•2004

  • Foucauldian Discourse Analysis

    Michael Arribas-Ayllon, Walkerdine et al.•The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative…•2008

  • Theorizing multi-partner relationships and sexualities – Recent work on non-monogamy and polyamory

    Open Access•C Klesse•Sexualities•2018

  • Polyamory

    Open Access•C Klesse•Sexualities•2014

  • Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships

    Kassia Wosick-Correa, Kassia R Wosick-Correa•Psychology and Sexuality•2010

  • Bisexuality

    Merl Storr•Bisexuality•2013

  • Love's Refraction

    Jillian Deri•Love's Refraction•2015

  • Qualitative Research Interviewing

    Tom Wengraf, Katherine Bischoping•Qualitative Research Interviewing•2001

  • Undoing Gender

    Judith Butler•Undoing Gender•2004

  • The Transformation of Intimacy

    Anthony Giddens•The transformation of intimacy•1992

  • Same Sex Intimacies

    Catherine Donovan, B Heaphy et al.•Same Sex Intimacies•2003

  • Bisexual Women, Non-Monogamy and Differentialist Anti-Promiscuity Discourses

    Open Access•C Klesse•Sexualities•2005

  • Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory

    Open Access•Meg Barker, D Langdridge•Sexualities•2010

  • Gender Trouble

    Judith Butler•Gender Trouble•2011

  • Bisexual citizenship in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Emiel Maliepaard•Sexualities•2015

  • Sexuality, subjectivity … and political economy

    Open Access•Clare Hemmings•Subjectivity•2012

  • Too much? Excessive sexual experiences in bisexual women’s life stories

    Open Access•Annukka Lahti•Subjectivity•2017

  • Not just bi the bi

    Katherine Hubbard, Katherine A Hubbard et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2014

  • A question of equality and choice’

    Adam Jowett, E Peel•Psychology and Sexuality•2017

  • Sensitive sexualities

    Sandra Souto Pereira, Sue Becker et al.•Psychology and Sexuality•2016

  • Monogamous order and the avoidance of chaotic excess

    Mark Finn•Psychology and Sexuality•2011

  • Sexual subjectification and Bitchy Jones's Diary

    Meg Barker, Rosalind Gill•Psychology and Sexuality•2011

  • Bisexual Women's Experiences with Binegativity in Romantic Relationships

    Samantha R DeCapua•Journal of Bisexuality•2017

  • Playing with Butler and Foucault

    April Scarlette Callis•Journal of Bisexuality•2009

  • Bisexuals in Relationships

    Malena Gustavson•Journal of Bisexuality•2009

  • Shady Characters, Untrustworthy Partners, and Promiscuous Sluts

    C Klesse•Journal of Bisexuality•2011

  • Becoming and Being

    James T Sears•Journal of Bisexuality•2014

  • II. Bisexuality

    Open Access•Meg Barker, D Langdridge•Feminism & Psychology•2008

  • Deficit and asset identity constructions of single women without children living in Australia

    Open Access•Elizabeth Addie, Charlotte Brownlow•Feminism & Psychology•2014

  • It’s a double-edged thing’

    Open Access•Alison Rolfe, E Peel•Feminism & Psychology•2011

  • Similar and equal relationships? Negotiating bisexuality in an enduring relationship

    Open Access•Annukka Lahti•Feminism & Psychology•2015

  • Divorcing Romance, Rights and Radicalism

    Open Access•E Peel, Rosie Harding•Feminism & Psychology•2004

  • Bisexual women’s understandings of social marginalisation

    Open Access•Nikki Hayfield, Victoria Clarke et al.•Feminism & Psychology•2014

  • Lesbian and Gay Marriage

    Open Access•Victoria Clarke•Feminism & Psychology•2003

  • The Personal Is Still Political

    Open Access•Stevi Jackson, Sue Scott•Feminism & Psychology•2004

  • Queer Individualization

    Sasha Roseneil•NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist…•2007

  • Psychoanalysis and Psychosocial Studies

    Open Access•Stephen Frosh, Lisa Baraitser•Psychoanalysis Culture & Society•2008

  • Sexuality

    Kate O’halloran•Australian Feminist Studies•2016

  • Empowerment/Sexism

    Open Access•Rosalind Gill•Feminism & Psychology•2008

  • An everyday affair

    Open Access•Jenny Van Hooff•The Sociological Review•2017

  • Intimacies

    Open Access•Karla A Erickson•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2015

  • Body Modification and Trans Men

    Open Access•Katelynn Bishop•Body & Society•2016

  • The Ambivalences of Angel's 'Arrangement

    Open Access•Sasha Roseneil•The Sociological Review•2006

  • Scripting Civil Partnerships

    Open Access•B Heaphy, Anna Einarsdóttir•Qualitative Research•2013

  • Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure

    Arlie Russell Hochschild•American Journal of Sociology•1979

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano0,67
Intervalo de citações2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae