Compromising Partisans

Intense partisanship and the permanent election mentality permeate Congress, such that bipartisanship is rare. Yet we contend that in overlooking intra-party compromises, observers both exaggerate the negative implications of partisan polarization and inflate the merits of inter-party cooperation. We show that in situations of unified government in this polarized era, meaningful compromises to enact major legislation may occur within heterogeneous parties instead of between polarized counterparts. Through an examination of health care reform in the 111th Congress, we demonstrate the significance of these intra-party compromises. While acknowledging that partisanship and the constant campaign cycle prevented bipartisan collaboration on health care reform and created a poisonous atmosphere, we nonetheless do not fuel the common anxiety over vitriolic partisanship – the same partisanship enhanced the importance of intra-party compromise for passing landmark legislation. Given that partisan tensions are not diminishing, our research also may provide food for thought for policy analysts. The article draws on material from one author’s informal, in-person conversations with over a dozen key actors in 2010 and 2011

Compromise · Government (linguistics · Health care · Health care reform · Legislation · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Public Administration · Health Policy

• Online products and consumers

  Open Access•Rachel L Neo, Benjamin K Johnson•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  Incluir item

• The Affordable Care Act and abortion

  Open Access•Deborah R Mcfarlane•Politics and the Life Sciences•2015

  Incluir item

• Perspectives on health care reform and the Affordable Care Act

  Open Access•Eileen Burgin•Politics and the Life Sciences•2015

  Incluir item