New ways of measuring energy poverty
Moving beyond temperature sensor data to assess and measure cold housing
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13064593 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cynthia Faye Barlow (0000-0001-7063-295X, The University of Adelaide, autor correspondente), Lyrian Daniel (0000-0001-9549-8515, The University of Adelaide), Emma Baker (0000-0002-9390-0491, The University of Adelaide) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 121 |
| Páginas | 103956-103956 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-02-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2025.103956 |
| OpenAlex | W4407073485 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
Many people live in cold homes that are hazardous to health. In the absence of high-quality observed data, researchers have measured cold housing and assessed its prevalence using secondary proxy indicators. Proxy measures previously used in literature include self-assessed warmth of the home, perceived energy affordability, financial inability to heat the home in winter, and local climate zone. Using matched in-home temperature sensor data from 502 Australian homes, we assess the validity of these proxy measures by estimating the degree of association with measured indoor temperature. We also examine twelve correlated socio-demographic characteristics to explore promising alternative proxy measures. Self-assessed perception of home warmth was shown to be the best existing proxy indicator of cold indoor air temperature (OR 2.5, CI 1.4 to 4.3), with climate zone (OR 2.4, CI 1.6 to 3.8) also shown to be a strong measure. Perceived energy affordability (OR 1.1, CI 0.7 to 1.9) and financial inability to adequately heat the home (OR 1.0, CI 0.6 to 1.6), were shown to be unsuitable proxy measures. Of the correlated socio-demographic characteristics, heating appliance type (electric heater OR 3.0, CI 1.4 to 6.2), household structure (living alone OR 2.5 CI 1.2 to 5.5), built date (built <1990 OR 2.11, CI 1.38 to 3.23) and flooring type (timber floor OR 1.99, CI 1.23 to 3.22) were strong indicators of cold indoor temperatures, and would make sound proxy measures. Our assessment of the reliability of existing and potential proxy measures of cold home temperature suggests a need to carefully select proxies, based on their known or established validity
Data mining · Economic growth · Economics · Energy poverty · Fuel poverty · Measure (data warehouse · Poverty · Advanced battery technologies research · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Computer Science · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Science
Tackling cold housing and fuel poverty in New Zealand
Fuel poverty and human health
Energy retrofit of an existing affordable building envelope in Spain, case study
Does cash money solve energy poverty? Assessing the impact of household heating allowances in Spain
Who lives in and owns cold homes? A case study of fuel poverty in Seoul, South Korea
My apartment is cold! Household perceptions of indoor climate and demand-side management in Sweden
Cold homes in Australia
Letting the Gini out of the fuel poverty bottle? Correlating cold homes and income inequality in European Union countries
Cold housing
Social housing temperature conditions and tenant priorities
Old and Cold
Housing and respiratory health at older ages
Perception vs. reality
Cold homes and mental health harm
The total health gains and cost savings of eradicating cold housing in Australia
How Older People Relate to the Private Winter Warmth Practices of Their Peers and Why We Should Be Interested
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |