Embodied competences in preparedness for blackouts
Mixed methods insights from rural and urban Norwegian households
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13065002 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Nina Heidenstrøm (0000-0002-6217-0609, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, autor correspondente), Anders Rhiger Hansen (0000-0003-2771-062X, Aalborg University) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Páginas | 101498-101498 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-04-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Energy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101498 |
| OpenAlex | W3020602684 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 71 |
As part of governmental risk management policies, households are advised to be aware of local preparedness plans, make a family emergency plan and kit, and stock supplies to increase their level of preparedness. But the sole focus on this ‘formal preparedness competence’ fails to consider the ‘embodied preparedness competence’ that comes into play during a blackout. Drawing on 25 in-depth interviews in Norwegian households and a representative web survey (N = 1,005), this article considers how an embodied competence shape household preparedness for extensive electricity and ICT infrastructure breakdowns. Informed by social practice theory, we define embodied competences as practical knowledge of how to act, and demonstrate the importance of three constituents: (i) previous experience with blackouts or having lived with restricted access to electricity or ICT; (ii) local geographical knowledge of climate and weather conditions and the built environment; and, (iii) mobilising social networks. The analysis shows that the formal preparedness competence was low, while the three constituents of the embodied competence were found to be significant preparedness resources. However, these varied between and within households, and most notably rural households had more experience with blackouts, more extensive social networks and were more engaged in their geographical surroundings than urban households. Our analysis provides important insights for policy in demonstrating that households should be recognized as resourceful through their everyday practices rather than by the level of implementation of formal preparedness resources
Embodied cognition · Environmental planning · Geography · Norwegian · Political science · Preparedness · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
The home as a site of crisis preparedness
Household energy resilience
The dispersed practice of trial and error
The utility of social practice theory in risk research
Returning Home after Decontamination? Applying the Protective Action Decision Model to a Nuclear Accident Scenario
Citizens’ Communication Needs and Attitudes to Risk in a Nuclear Accident Scenario
If something breaks, who comes here to fix it?”
I hope they shouldn't happen”
What is in it for me?” A people-centered account of household energy transition co-benefits in Poland
I never look at a temperature device, I just feel it”
Practicing urban resilience to electricity service disruption in Accra, Ghana
Mapping precarious energy geographies
Redefining Citizen Preparedness Through Social Practice Theory – Implications for Preparedness Policy
Practice Theory as a Package of Theory, Method and Vocabulary
Disrupted Cities
Personal Disaster Preparedness
Household Emergency Preparedness
Debating the future of comfort
Making energy visible
May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide
Sustainable practices
Risk, Environment and Modernity
Time, Consumption and Everyday Life
Social Capital
Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation
Doing Visual Ethnography
The Dynamics of Social Practice
Natural Hazards and Motivation for Mitigation Behavior
Disasters by Design
The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake preparedness
Household Adjustment to Earthquake Hazard
Preparing for Critical Infrastructure Breakdowns
Housework
Neighbors Helping Neighbors
Exergy and the City
Qualitative research can improve understandings about disaster preparedness for independent older adults in the community
Energy, the city and everyday life
The dynamics of energy demand
Practices, provision and protest
Home -ing in on domestic energy research
The social structure of heat consumption in Denmark
Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption
Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption
(Re)introducing embodied practical understanding to the sociology of sustainable consumption
Informal household preparedness
Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices
Ready or Not? How Citizens and Public Officials Perceive Risk and Preparedness
Like a Fish Out of Water
Interaction Pretext
Social Capital as Collective Narratives and Post-Disaster Community Recovery
People can talk about their practices
Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories
Preparedness for Emergency Response
What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand
Emergent Citizen Groups and Emergency Management
Tuning In, Tuning Out
Come take a walk with me
The Status of the "Material" in Theories of Culture
Consumption and Theories of Practice
The Perception of the Environment
Local Friendship Ties and Community Attachment in Mass Society
Beyond the ABC
Habits, routines and temporalities of consumption
Know your neighbours
Revisiting 'Communities in Britain
Resilience and the Neoliberal Project
The Ethnography of Infrastructure
Preparing for the Next Emergency
Toward a Theory of Social Practices
The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure
Earth, sky, wind, and weather
The Strength of Weak Ties
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,17 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |