Renewables but unjust? Critical restoration geography as a framework for addressing global renewable energy injustice

Dados Bibliográficos

ID13065521
AutoresChinedu C Nsude (0000-0002-9359-2708, University of Oklahoma, autor correspondente), Rebecca Loraamm (0000-0002-6829-0468, University of Oklahoma), Joshua J Wimhurst (0000-0002-2606-3910, University of Oklahoma), God'sgift N Chukwuonye (University of Arizona), Ramit Debnath (0000-0003-0727-5683, California Institute of Technology, autor correspondente)
Ano2024
Volume114
Páginas103609-103609
Data de publicação2024-05-31
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEnergy Research & Social Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2214-6296 • E-ISSN: 2214-6326
EditoraElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.erss.2024.103609
OpenAlexW4399203648
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas105

A global transition toward a sustainable energy system, incorporating for example Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs), is essential for decarbonizing electricity production, meeting energy demands, and mitigating the impacts of climate change. However, the growing scale of renewable energy development has exacerbated local environmental and social challenges; improper assessment of RETs has led to recorded conflicts and resource injustice in transitioning communities. The purpose of this study is to analyze global cases of renewable energy development resulting in conflict and environmental injustice, and to propose Critical Restoration Geography (CRG) as a framework strategizing for pre-emptive avoidance of RET-related injustices. Evidence of global environmental injustice in RET development was explored using recorded conflicts from the Global Atlas of Environmental Justice (EJAtlas). We synthesized global variations in affected demographics, land area and conflict resolution with respect to achievement of environmental justice by RET type (wind, solar, biomass, geothermal). Based on analysis of GEJA's 102 recorded cases of RET-related environmental (in)justice from 2001 to 2021, justice was either not achieved or ambiguous in 55 and 20 cases. Drivers for these injustices include displacement of Indigenous communities, exclusion of communities from decision making processes, and protection of business interests over biodiversity and community needs. The proposed CRG framework details seven principles for avoiding environmental injustice in global RET development; including recognition and deconstruction of power dynamics, incorporation of multiple knowledge systems, and promotion of social justice. These principles serve to inform environmentally just approaches to policymaking for future RET development in any geographical context

Business · Economics · Environmental degradation · Environmental justice · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Injustice · Political science · Renewable energy · Sociology · Engineering · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Ecology