What can science do in the face of pandemics

In 2020, the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW) publicly announced a prize question: “What can science do in the face of pandemics?” (2021). For this journal article the prize-winning essay submitted by the author was translated, updated and - thanks to helpful reviewer comments - revised. Science, it is argued, has different roles in times of crisis: First of all, it must educate about the (changing) crisis situation and provide as robust data, studies and facts as possible. In order to stabilize public trust in science, it is also necessary to provide the public an insight into the logic of scientific knowledge production and related uncertainties and insufficiencies. Last but not least, science has to educate about the limits of its own responsibility and authority. This means that the basic difference between science and politics should not be blurred. Especially in times of crisis, when the political value of science is particularly evident, science should avoid the impression that it can replace political decision-making thanks to its findings

Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept · Order (exchange · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · Health and Medical Studies · Law · Medicine · Philosophy

• The public sphere and democracy in transformation

  Open Access•Hauke Brunkhorst, Martin Seeliger et al.•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2024

  Incluir item

• Wissenschaft als Beruf

  Peter Witt•Wissenschaft als Beruf und Berufung•2016

  Incluir item

• Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature

  Open Access•John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2013

  Incluir item

• Leviathan and the Air-Pump

  Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer•Leviathan and the Air-Pump•2011

  Incluir item