Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Institutional determinants of smart government adoption

Evidence from Thai public sector organizations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID13137644
AutoresPanitee Karnsomdee (0000-0002-4551-8239, Kasetsart University, autor correspondente)
Ano2026
Volume8
Data de publicação2026-03-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145
EditoraFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpos.2026.1732138
OpenAlexW7135047799
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas59

This study examines the determinants of smart government systems adoption among government officials in Thailand by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Employing a quantitative research design, data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 450 public sector officials with prior experience in smart government services. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used to assess factors influencing adoption behavior. The results indicate that managerial support, incentives, trust, security concerns, and information and communication technology (ICT) strategy significantly affect smart government adoption, although their relative influences differ. Drawing on TAM and UTAUT, the findings emphasize the roles of perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions, and institutional trust in shaping technology acceptance within the public sector context. This study contributes theoretically by extending TAM–UTAUT integration to the smart government domain and highlighting the importance of organizational and trust-related factors beyond individual-level perceptions. Empirically, it provides evidence from a developing-country public sector setting, focusing on government officials as both system implementers and end-users. Practically, the findings offer policy-relevant insights to support effective smart government implementation, inter-organizational collaboration, and digital service delivery

E-Government · Government (linguistics · Government sector · Information technology · Public sector · Public service · Service (business · Technology Acceptance Model · E-Government and Public Services · Smart Cities and Technologies · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour

  • AI adoption in Thailand's e-government services

    Open Access•Siriporn Thitalampoon, Attama Boonpalit et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Regression Diagnostics

    John Fox, John P Fox•Regression Diagnostics•1991

  • Digital government and public management research

    Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Sharon S Dawes et al.•Public Management Review•2018

  • Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

    Open Access•Yogesh K Dwivedi, Nripendra P Rana et al.•Information Systems Frontiers•2019

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2003

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • User Acceptance of Computer Technology

    Open Access•Fred D Davis, Richard P Bagozzi et al.•Management Science•1989

  • Digitally-induced change in the public sector

    Open Access•Nathalie Haug, Sorin Dan et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations

    Open Access•Oliver Neumann, Katharina Guirguis et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Analysis of IoT adoption for vegetable crop cultivation

    Open Access•Gabriela Scur, André Victor Duarte da Silva et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Understanding E-participation adoption

    Open Access•Ivana Ninčević Pašalić, Maja Ćukušić•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Cybersecurity in local governments

    Open Access•Sk Tahsin Hossain, Tan Yigitcanlar et al.•Urban Governance•2025

  • The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education

    Open Access•Liangyong Xue, Abdullah Mat Rashid et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success

    Open Access•Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Miguel Á Flores-Zúñiga•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • An integrative public IoT framework for smart government

    Open Access•Bernd W Wirtz, Jan C Weyerer et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment

    Open Access•José Ramón Saura, Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • IoT and AI for Smart Government

    Open Access•Atreyi Kankanhalli, Yannis Charalabidis et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Adoption of open government data among government agencies

    Open Access•Hai‐jun Wang, Hui-Ju Wang et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Exploring the management of multi-sectoral cybersecurity information-sharing networks

    Open Access•Kaiju Chang, Hsini Huang•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Artificial intelligence in public services

    Open Access•Tanja Sophie Gesk, Michael Leyer•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Assessing information security risks in the cloud

    Open Access•Omar Ali, Anup Shrestha et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness

    Open Access•Saman Arshad, Sobia Khurram•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Using diffusion of innovation theory and sentiment analysis to analyze attitudes toward driving adoption by Saudi women

    Open Access•Muna Al-Razgan, Muna Al‐Razgan et al.•Technology in Society•2021

  • E-Government Services Adoption

    Open Access•Isaac Kofi Mensah, Guohua Zeng et al.•SAGE Open•2020

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae