The Uses of Neo-Confucianism
A Response to Professor Tillman
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13637191 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Wm Theodore De Bary (autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1993 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 541-541 |
| Data de publicação | 1993-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Philosophy East and West (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0031-8221 • E-ISSN: 1529-1898 |
| Editora | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1399581 |
| OpenAlex | W2324249754 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
In his article for Philosophy East and West titled A New Direction in Confucian Scholarship: Approaches to Examining the Differences between Neo-Confucianism and Tao-hsueh (volume 42, number 3), Hoyt Tillman endeavors to clarify the use of these terms in hopes of shedding new light on the historical development of Confucianism. I am not sure that I follow his argument entirely, but the main points, briefly stated, seem to be these: (1) that a certain view of Neo-Confucianism, propagated at Columbia by myself and Professor Wing-tsit Chan, has tended to dominate the field; (2) that our use of the term NeoConfucianism has nevertheless been inconsistent, vague, confusing, and particularly prejudicial to a good understanding of tao-hsueh; and (3) that we would do better without it, just using Confucianism instead, and paying closer attention to tao-hsueh. If I have reservations about how Professor Tillman adumbrates his
Political science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,19 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2021 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |