Meta-Analysis of Social Presence Effects on Stroop Task Performance
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13656168 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Teresa Garcia-Marques (0000-0002-6233-0799, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, autor correspondente), Alexandre Fernandes (0000-0001-6644-688X, ISPA - Instituto Universitário), Alexandre C Fernandes (ISPA - Instituto Universitário) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 129 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 29-62 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-01-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00332941241227150 |
| PMID | 38291607 |
| OpenAlex | W4391394531 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 95 |
In this paper, we conducted a meta-analytic review to examine the impact of social presence on individuals' performance on the Stroop task, shedding light on the cognitive processes underlying social facilitation. We followed PRISMA guidelines to identify and include 33 relevant studies in a multivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Our results show that social presence reliably modulates Stroop interference (a measure of cognitive control); specifically, participants exhibit lower Stroop interference when performing the task in the presence of others compared to performing it in isolation. We also found that the strength of the effect varies depending on the type of social presence: it is stronger with an attentive audience compared to an inattentive one, and null with an evaluative audience. Additionally, different features of the Stroop task itself moderate the effect; the effect is stronger for the classic version of the task compared to the semantic version, and for experiments that use mixed within-block trials compared to those with homogenous blocks. We also observed a negative relationship between the number of trials and the magnitude of the effect. Overall, these findings provide insights into the mechanisms by which the presence of others affects performance on the Stroop task, and how they align with social facilitation theories
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Facilitation · Meta-analysis · Social facilitation · Stroop effect · Task (project management · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Distraction-Conflict Theory
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
Dimensional overlap
The variable nature of cognitive control
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.
Social Facilitation
On the control of automatic processes
How to do a meta‐analysis
Estimation of a Single Effect Size
Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias
Trim and Fill
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Hierarchical linear models
The loci of Stroop effects
The other side of self-monitoring
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect
Mere presence effects in humans
Inhibitory Process of Collaborative Inhibition
Social facilitation of word associations
The influence of mere social presence on Stroop interference
Social presence effects on the stroop task
Improved Cognitive Control in Presence of Anthropomorphized Robots
The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks
Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others
Social facilitation of word associations
Social presence effects in the Stroop task
Social "facilitation" as challenge and threat
Selective attention improves under stress
Testing the mere effort account of the evaluation-performance relationship
The role of time pressure on the emotional Stroop task
A power primer
Drive theory of social facilitation
Social facilitation
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |