Comparison of Conservation Training Procedures
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13657136 |
|---|---|
| Autores | David R Anderson (0000-0002-1128-6206, Duke Medical Center, autor correspondente), Alice T Clark (University of North Dakota) |
| Ano | 1978 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 495-499 |
| Data de publicação | 1978-10-01 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.2.495 |
| OpenAlex | W2023735347 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 7 |
Direct comparisons were made among four different conservation training procedures, reversibility training, compensation training, addidition/subtraction training and a verbal reinforcement method in order to determine which might best facilitate conservation acquisition in previously nonconserving first grade students. The data indicated that verbal methods stressing principles of reversibility and addition/subtraction resulted in the acquisition of concepts of conservation statistically comparable to that of a group of natural conservers
Arithmetic · Compensation (psychology · Geography · Reinforcement · Subtraction · Training (meteorology · Animal and Plant Science Education · Art Education and Development · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citações por ano | 0,04 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 1979 - 2005 (27) |
| Altamente citado | Não |