Performance Evaluation
A Case for the Use of Consensus Ratings
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 13675591 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lawrence S Kleiman (University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, autor correspondente), John W Lounsbury (University of Tennessee at Knoxville), Robert H Faley (Kent State University) |
| Ano | 1987 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 407-413 |
| Data de publicação | 1987-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1987.60.2.407 |
| OpenAlex | W2121031588 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
Data from a sample of government research scientists were used to compare the psychometric properties of pooled and consensus ratings of job performance. It was hypothesized that consensus ratings would possess less halo and leniency error and greater validity than would pooled ratings. The findings supported the halo hypothesis and partially supported the validity hypothesis. Given the severity of the “criterion problem” in validation research, further research was recommended to extend the generalizability of these findings to other performance appraisal settings
Construct validity · Criterion validity · Developmental psychology · External validity · Generalizability theory · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Accounting and Organizational Management · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,09 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2004 - 2007 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |