Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Archaeology on Screen

Representing Archaeology on Film in Serbia

Dados Bibliográficos

ID14713635
AutoresAleksandar Bandović (0000-0002-9696-2241, autor correspondente)
Ano2013
Volume8
Fascículo3
Páginas845-863
Data de publicação2013-09-17
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEtnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0353-1589 • E-ISSN: 2334-8801
EditoraUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Ethnology and Anthropology (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.21301/eap.v8i3.11
OpenAlexW2555640659
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas9

Reading the popular culture may contribute to the reflexive view on a discipline such as archaeology. Film, as a part of popular culture, frequently unveils the hidden messages, which may be an echo of a discipline or its distorted image in the mirror. Film and archaeology share not only the common origins in the modernity, but also the imaginary spaces where the past and the present meet and intertwine. The subjects treated in films, the contexts in which archaeology appears, speak of the place the discipline holds in the society, reminding us at the same time of all the elements encompassed by the archaeological discourse. On the other hand, if we compare the portraits of the imaginary archaeologists (such as Professor Mihajlo Pavlović, Vera Zarić), with the witnesses of archaeology in Serbia over the 20th century (Nikola Vulić, Dragoslav Srejović, Milutin Garašanin), we shall approach the meeting point between academic and general public, science and the audience, theory and practice. Extraordinary individuals, unemployed dreamers living at the borders of the worlds, charming connoisseurs of the underworlds – these are but some of the qualities ascribed to the discipline by the films. However, these stereotypes do not generate out of the void, they are the consequence of the self-representation. This mystification of the discipline leads us back to the debate on the responsibility and ethics of the social scientists inside the society they live in. Of course, the suggested reading is one of the many possibilities, one of the archaeological interpretations

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Linguistics · Modernity · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Reading (process · Reflexivity · Representation (politics · Sociology · The Imaginary · The Void · Anthropology · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Past is a Foreign Country

    Eugene Webb, David Lowenthal•The American Historical Review•1986

  • Culture

    Joseph Bram, A L Kroeber et al.•American Sociological Review•1953

  • Understanding Popular Culture

    John Fiske•Understanding popular culture•2010

  • Romancing the Stones

    Open Access•Mark A Hall•European Journal of Archaeology•2004

  • Why Indiana Jones is smarter than the Post‐Processualists∗

    John Bintliff•Norwegian Archaeological Review•1993

  • Angkor Meets Tomb Raider

    T Winter•International Journal of Heritage…•2002

  • Heroes, Mummies, and Treasure

    Kevin M Mcgeough, Kevin Mcgeough•Near Eastern Archaeology•2006

  • Self-image, the long view and archaeological engagement with film

    Ben Marwick•World Archaeology•2010

  • Social Space and Symbolic Power

    Pierre Bourdieu•Sociological Theory•1989

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae