Parents’ estimation of their children's body size compared to classification of children's nutritional status using the international growth reference
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 14722124 |
|---|---|
| Autores | T Moffat (0000-0002-9273-0339, McMaster University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2000 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 311-329 |
| Data de publicação | 2000-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Ecology of Food and Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0367-0244 • E-ISSN: 1543-5237 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03670244.2000.9991621 |
| OpenAlex | W2045314479 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 30 |
While debates abound about the appropriateness of using an international growth reference in low‐income countries and the use of cut‐off points as diagnostics for malnutrition, there is little discussion about the relevance of anthropometric assessment of children for the population of concern. While the issue of cultural appropriateness may appear to be an arcane anthropological question, it does have wider applied significance in the field in terms of involving parents in growth monitoring programs and community nutrition surveillance. In a sample of 283 parents (mostly mothers) participating in a child health and nutrition study in peri‐urban Kathmandu, Nepal, a majority of parents (68.4%) whose children were classified by NCHS standards as moderately‐to‐severely malnourished (i.e. below the ‐2SD cut‐off for ht/age and wt/age) deemed them to be small in size. When children were divided into age groups, it was found that parents were very accurate at labelling their children as “small” when their children were under 36 months of age and much less accurate when they were between 36 and 60 months of age. Parents’ perception of smallness of their children based on ‘ranking’ is sensitive and reasonably correlated with objective growth measures. Parents’ opinions regarding the nutritional and health status of their children should be taken seriously and be incorporated into growth monitoring and community surveillance programs
Anthropometry · Developing country · Economic growth · Environmental health · Malnutrition · Pathology · Population · Ranking (information retrieval · Weight for Age · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Demography · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Pediatrics
Physical growth
Height and Weight Standards for Preschool Children
Anthropometric assessment of energy-protein malnutrition and subsequent risk of mortality among preschool aged children
Behavioral quality and caloric intake in Malagasy children relative to international growth references
Diarrheal diseases and growth retardation in preschool Guatemalan children
Growth differences between children of highland and coastal Ecuador
Adaptation to Low Protein and Energy Intakes
Is growth monitoring worthwhile? An evaluation of its use in three child health programmes in Zaire
Concepts about infant health, growth, and weaning
Growth monitoring-inappropriate promotion of an appropriate technology
Social Science Lessons from Diarrhea Research and Their Application to ARI
Body Size, Adaptation and Function
Small but Healthy? An Anthropological Perspective
Small but Healthy? Some Cultural Considerations
Small but Healthy? Are We Asking the Right Question
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,25 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2021 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |