Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking

Dados Bibliográficos

ID14869355
AutoresYashar Mansoori (0000-0002-4222-4710, Chalmers University of Technology, autor correspondente), Martin Lackéus (0000-0001-9355-3496, Chalmers University of Technology)
Ano2020
Volume54
Fascículo3
Páginas791-818
Data de publicação2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSmall Business Economics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0921-898X • E-ISSN: 1573-0913
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w
OpenAlexW2920714770
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas92

There has been a growing interest among entrepreneurs and students in explicit guidance for entrepreneurial action. Both scholars and practitioners have responded to this demand by suggesting a variety of entrepreneurial methods. This has led, however, to a proliferation of relatively unrelated methods with varying degrees of rigor and relevance. In an attempt to organize and bring clarity to the range and diversity of entrepreneurial methods, this article compares effectuation with five other entrepreneurial methods along nine conceptual dimensions. Through the application of two conceptual frameworks, core underpinnings of each method are highlighted. In addition to revealing similarities and differences between the methods, the study identifies some key implications for theory, practice, policy, and education. The strengths of effectuation on a theoretical level could be used to develop other entrepreneurial methods. Conversely, the strengths of other entrepreneurial methods could be used to shore up the potential weaknesses of effectuation, such as a lack of behavioral tactics and limited applicability in later stages of venture development. Findings from this article can thus aid entrepreneurship scholars and practitioners to improve their prescriptions and can create new avenues for developing entrepreneurial methods

Action (physics · Business · CLARITY · Conceptual framework · Economics · Entrepreneurship · Knowledge management · Management science · Political science · Process management · Relevance (law · Scope (computer science · Social science · Sociology · Strengths and weaknesses · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Innovation and Socioeconomic Development · Psychology · Social Psychology