Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Factors associated with the decision to investigate child protective services referrals

A systematic review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID15080502
AutoresJeri Damman (0000-0001-9136-2725, Department of Social Work and Social Care University of Sussex Brighton UK), Michelle Johnson‐Motoyama (0000-0003-2904-8131, College of Social Work The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA), Susan Well (0000-0001-5914-9350, School of Social Work and Department of Psychology The University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada), Kelly Harrington (0000-0001-9668-183X, School of Social Welfare The University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas USA)
Ano2020
Volume25
Fascículo4
Páginas785-804
Data de publicação2020-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoChild & Family Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1356-7500 • E-ISSN: 1365-2206
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cfs.12755
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas13
Referências citadas31

Limited resources for child protection create challenging decision situations for child protective services (CPS) workers at the point of intake. A body of research has examined the factors associated with worker decisions and processes using a variety of methodological approaches to gain knowledge on decision‐making. However, few attempts have been made to systematically review this literature. As part of a larger project on decision‐making at intake, this systematic review addressed the question of the factors associated with worker decisions to investigate alleged maltreatment referrals. Quantitative studies that examined factors associated with screening decisions in CPS practice settings were included in the review. Database and other search methods were used to identify research published in English over a 35‐year period (1980–2015). Of 1,147 identified sources, 18 studies were selected for full data extraction. The studies were conducted in the United States, Canada, and Sweden and varied in methodological quality. Most studies examined case factors with few studies examining other domains. To inform CPS policy and practice, additional research is needed to examine the relationships between decision‐making factors and case outcomes. Greater attention needs to be given to the organizational and external factors that influence decision‐making

  • Understanding Vulnerability During Preventive Child Health Examinations

    Open Access•Sarah Kornum Melgaard, Lotte Lykke Larsen et al.•Children•2026

  • A critique of virtual court for intimate partner abuse victims in child welfare cases

    Open Access•Sharon Parsons•Family Court Review•2022

  • Diagnostic disparities among maltreated youth in a child protective services agency

    Shadie Burke, Christopher A Kearney•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2022

  • People processing in the Swedish child welfare system

    Open Access•Tommy Lundström, Marie Sallnäs et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2025

  • If You Thought It Was Going to Make a Difference, You'd Do It Straight Away’

    Open Access•E Keddell, Sarah Colhoun et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2025

  • The stark implications of abolishing child welfare

    Open Access•Antonio R Garcia, Jill D Berrick et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2024

  • Social Work Paradigms and Their Effect on Decision Making About Out-of-Home Placement

    Open Access•Jarosław Przeperski•Research on Social Work Practice•2021

  • Examining the role of the parent-caseworker relationship in child maltreatment decision-making

    Erika Tullberg, Wendy Vaughon•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2024

  • A Rapid Review on Complaint Mechanisms for Interpersonal Violence

    Open Access•Stephanie Radziszewski, Sylvie Parent et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2024

  • The context‐bound phenomenon of decision‐making on referrals

    Open Access•Anne Marie Villumsen, Camilla Armstrong Gjedde•Children & Society•2023

  • The role of the family’s ethnicity and correlates in social workers’ risk perceptions

    Open Access•Marianna Kopasz, Tamás Bartus et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • Decisions in Child Protection—Heuristics, Law and Organisation

    Open Access•Frank Ebsen, Frank Cloyd Ebsen et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2023

  • Eligibility for child welfare services

    Open Access•David Pålsson, Tommy Lundström et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

    Julia H Littell, Jacqueline Corcoran et al.•Systematic Reviews and…•2008

  • A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child maltreatment

    Open Access•J F Brown, Jocelyn Brown et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•1998

  • Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries

    Open Access•Ruth Gilbert, Cathy Spatz Widom et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Protecting Children in the Age of Outrage

    Ram Jagannathan, Radha Jagannathan et al.•When to Protect?•2013

  • Factors that determine decision making in child protection investigations

    Open Access•Camilla Lauritzen, Svein Arild Vi et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2018

  • Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision-Making

    Open Access•E Keddell•Social Sciences•2014

  • Issues in Risk Assessment in Child Protective Services

    Ronald C Hughes, Judith S Rycusa•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2006

  • Using classification and regression trees (Cart) to support worker decision making

    M A Johnson, C H Brown et al.•Social Work Research•2002

  • Major life events and the risk of a child maltreatment investigation

    Open Access•Marla McDaniel, Kristen S Slack•Children and Youth Services Review•2005

  • The next step

    Open Access•Aron Shlonsky, Dennis Wagner•Children and Youth Services Review•2005

  • The decision to investigate

    Open Access•Susan Well, John Fluke et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•1995

  • Ecological factors and screening in child protective services

    Open Access•Susan Well, Peter Lyons et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2004

  • Key decisions in child protective services

    Open Access•Ruth Lawrence Karski•Children and Youth Services Review•1999

  • Observing Front Line Decision Making in Child Protection

    David Saltiel•The British Journal of Social Work•2016

  • Child Protection and the Media

    Patrick Ayre•The British Journal of Social Work•2001

  • Performing 'Initial Assessment

    Open Access•Karen Broadhurst, David Wastell et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2010

  • Using 'Consensual Ideology

    Francesca Östberg•The British Journal of Social Work•2014

  • Avoidable and Unavoidable Mistakes in Child Protection Work

    Eileen Munro•The British Journal of Social Work•1996

  • Decision Making in Child Protection

    R Jones, Richard D Jones•The British Journal of Social Work•1996

  • How Do Child-Protection Practitioners Make Decisions in Real-Life Situations? Lessons from the Psychology of Decision Making

    Open Access•Andrew Whittaker•The British Journal of Social Work•2018

  • Social Worker Experience of Fatal Child Abuse

    Open Access•Lee W Pollard, Lee Pollard•The British Journal of Social Work•2018

  • From Menzies Lyth to Munro

    Amanda Lees, Edgar Meyer et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2013

  • Making Threshold Decisions in Child Protection

    David Platt, Danielle Turney•The British Journal of Social Work•2014

Obras citantes distintas13
Citações por ano2,6
Intervalo de citações2021 - 2026 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae