Spatial distribution of the risk for metabolic complications
An application in south-east Brazil, 2006–2007
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15093005 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Luciana Bertoldi Nucci (0000-0002-5140-3622, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), autor correspondente), Lia TO Zangirolani (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas), Ana Carolina Cintra Nunes Mafra (0000-0001-9004-7176, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Ana Carolina CN Mafra, Maria Angélica Tavares De Medeiros (0000-0002-8982-7084, Universidade Federal de São Paulo), Ricardo Carlos Cordeiro (0000-0002-0437-1066, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Ricardo Cordeiro (0000-0001-6624-3070) |
| Ano | 2012 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 1008-1014 |
| Data de publicação | 2012-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980011003363 |
| PMID | 22217669 |
| OpenAlex | W2123763016 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 38 |
Objective To identify spatial variation in the risk for metabolic complications (RMC) by means of a semi-parametric approach for multinomial data. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting We visited 730 households selected in the first of a two-stage sample in South health district in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, 2006–2007. Subjects We interviewed 651 individuals and obtained their respective anthropometric measures and geographical coordinates of their house location. They were classified according to a combination of BMI and abdominal circumference as having no risk, increased, high or very high RMC. Results Gender, age and schooling were associated with RMC. Crude spatial risk for the three levels of RMC in relation to the absence of risk suggested different patterns in each level. Adjusted spatial risk for the RMC showed smaller significant areas, but the pattern remained similar to crude risk. Conclusions Spatial point analysis with a multinomial approach improves the understanding of differences in RMC found, as we could identify specific areas in which to intervene. The public health significance of these findings may lie in the additional evidence provided that spatial location and its features can influence patterns of RMC
Anthropometry · Environmental health · Geography · Multinomial distribution · Multinomial logistic regression · Statistics · Demography · Health disparities and outcomes · Mathematics · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Urban Transport and Accessibility
The dual burden household and the nutrition transition paradox
Obesity and the Built Environment
A Nutrition Paradox — Underweight and Obesity in Developing Countries
Environmental Contributions to the Obesity Epidemic
Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030
Obesity in Adulthood and Its Consequences for Life Expectancy
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008
Healthy Nutrition Environments
The Global Epidemic of Obesity
The Continuing Epidemics of Obesity and Diabetes in the United States
Overweight and obesity in urban Africa
The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower-income countries
Obesogenic environments – aspects on measurement and indicators
A corner store intervention in a low-income urban community is associated with increased availability and sales of some healthy foods
Socio-spatial disparities of obesity among adults in the urban setting of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Anthropometric indices and their relationship with cardiometabolic risk factors in a sample of Turkish adults
Measuring the food environment using geographical information systems
The Contribution of Expanding Portion Sizes to the US Obesity Epidemic
The Burden of Disease From Undernutrition and Overnutrition in Countries Undergoing Rapid Nutrition Transition
Size matters
Disparities in obesity rates
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |