Measurement error of waist circumference
Gaps in knowledge
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15096036 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lisanne M Verweij (Amsterdam Public Health), Caroline B Terwee (0000-0003-4570-2826, Amsterdam Public Health), Karin I Proper (0000-0001-7016-1625, Amsterdam Public Health, autor correspondente), Carel TJ Hulshof, Carel Hulshof (0000-0002-2720-456X, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Willem Van Mechelen (0000-0001-7136-6382, Amsterdam Public Health) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 281-288 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Health Nutrition (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1368-9800 • E-ISSN: 1475-2727 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1368980012002741 |
| PMID | 22626254 |
| OpenAlex | W2102693640 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
Objective It is not clear whether measuring waist circumference in clinical practice is problematic because the measurement error is unclear, as well as what constitutes a clinically relevant change. The present study aimed to summarize what is known from state-of-the-art research. Design To identify the magnitude of the measurement error of waist circumference measurements from the literature, a search was conducted in PubMed from 1975 to February 2011. Results The measurement error may vary between 0·7 cm and 15 cm. Taking a realistic range of measurable waist circumference into account (60–135 cm), we argue that a short-term clinically relevant change in waist circumference of 5 % may lie between 3·0 and 6·8 cm and a maintained clinically relevant change of 3 % between 1·8 and 4·1 cm. Conclusions Based on these results, we conclude it may be difficult to distinguish clinically relevant change from measurement error in individual subjects, due to the large measurement error and unclear definition of clinically relevant change. More research is needed to address these gaps in knowledge. To minimize measurement error, we recommend using a uniform measurement protocol, training and repeated measurements
Alternative medicine · Body mass index · Circumference · Observational error · Pathology · Statistics · Waist · Body Composition Measurement Techniques · Exercise and Physiological Responses · Mathematics · Medicine · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Internal Medicine
Integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy can increase physical activity and improve health of adult ambulatory care patients in a regional hospital
Comparison of Three Diagnostic Definitions of Metabolic Syndrome and Estimation of Its Prevalence in Mongolia
Measuring obesity in the absence of a gold standard
Building community capacity to stimulate physical activity and dietary behavior in Dutch secondary schools
Health Measurement Scales
The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition
Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1
Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status
Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management
Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27 000 participants from 52 countries
Physical Status
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties
Low functional status as a predictor of incidence of emotional disorders in the general population
Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments
Prediction of hypertension by different anthropometric indices in adults
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,36 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |