Factors Affecting Student Tolerance for Free-Roaming Cats

The management of free-roaming domestic cats is a controversial and challenging issue for animal welfare organizations and government agencies. In this article, we used a previously validated concept, wildlife acceptance capacity, to measure tolerance for free-roaming cats. We also identified the demographic, situational, and affective factors influencing tolerance, and evaluated the effect of tolerance on attitudes toward cat management. We conducted a written survey with 381 university students, measuring experiences with outdoor cats, perceptions of and tolerance for the cat population, attitudes toward cats and cat management, and risk perceptions. Tolerance/acceptance was measured as preference for reducing future cat population levels. A 7-item model—including positive and negative experiences, attitudes, beliefs, perceived risks, and perceptions of the current cat population—predicted acceptance 81% of the time. Cat acceptance predicted attitudes toward cat management and should be addressed in future campaigns aimed at reducing the population of free-roaming cats

Animal welfare · Biology · Environmental health · Government (linguistics · Perception · Population · Preference · Roaming · Situational ethics · Computer Science · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology · Zoonotic diseases and public health · Ecology

• Addressing the challenge of wildlife conservation in urban landscapes by increasing human tolerance for wildlife

  Open Access•Mahi Puri, Kristina L Johannsen et al.•People and Nature•2024

  Incluir item

• Beyond the tolerance/intolerance dichotomy

  Lara J Brenner, Elizabeth Covelli Metcalf•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2019

  Incluir item

• Attitudes towards predation by domestic cats in UK nature reserves differs between conservation researchers and conservation practitioners and is affected by cat ownership

  Open Access•Ailun Wang, Tara J Pirie et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2025

  Incluir item

• Evaluating cognitive and behavioral measures of tolerance for wildlife in an invasive species context

  Open Access•Hailey E Ellis, Alan D Bright et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2023

  Incluir item

• Roaming the Campus

  Eliza Ruiz Izaguirre, David Oseguera Montiel•Anthrozoös•2021

  Incluir item

• Perceptions of Veterinarians in British Columbia of Cat Management Strategies to Reduce Cat Overpopulation and Impacts on Wildlife Populations

  Open Access•Lauren J Sherwood, Amy G Wilson et al.•Anthrozoös•2019

  Incluir item

• The Role of Affect in Public Support and Opposition to Wolf Management

  Kristina M Slagle, Jeremy T Bruskotter et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2012

  Incluir item

• Influence of Demographics, Experience and Value Orientations on Preferences for Lethal Management of Feral Cats

  Kerrie Anne T Loyd, Craig A Miller•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2010

  Incluir item

• Attitudinal and Normative Influences on Support for Hunting as a Wildlife Management Strategy

  J Michael Campbell, Jeffrey M Campbell et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2003

  Incluir item

• Factors that Influence Concern About Human–Black Bear Interactions in Residential Settings

  William F Siemer, P Sol Hart et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2009

  Incluir item

• Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity in Wildlife management

  Len H Carpenter, Daniel J Decker et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  Incluir item

• Risk perception as a factor in Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity for cougars in montana

  Shawn J Riley, Daniel J Decker•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  Incluir item

• Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity for black bears, beavers, and other beasts in the east

  John F Organ, Mark R Ellingwood•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  Incluir item

• Social psychological bases for Stakeholder acceptance Capacity

  Harry C Zinn, Michael J Manfredo et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  Incluir item

• Perceptions of ecological risk from natural hazards

  Lawrence J Axelrod, Timothy L Mcdaniels et al.•Journal of Risk Research•1999

  Incluir item

• How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits

  Open Access•Baruch Fischhoff, Paul Slovic et al.•Policy Sciences•1978

  Incluir item