Moral Dilemmas in Contact-Based Care

Currently, forensic psychiatry shows a shift from a control-based to a contact-based approach. Working from contact may, however, entail new moral questions and dilemmas. How to secure safety when focusing on contact? Does contact imply being physically close to the patient, or should one refrain from intimate relations? In order to help care professionals to deal with these moral issues, clinical ethics support can be useful. A specific approach in clinical ethics support is moral case deliberation (MCD). An MCD is a structured dialogue between professionals on a moral issue they experience in practice, structured by a conversation method and guided by a facilitator. In this article, we describe the background and procedures of MCD. Furthermore, we present a case example in which care professionals reflect on the moral question of whether provision of care in forensic psychiatry may entail physical closeness. The MCD shows that an open conversation results in a better understanding of different perspectives and creates the basis for finding a joint way to proceed in the case. We conclude that MCD can enable professionals to reflect on moral issues and develop shared values in forensic psychiatry

Closeness · Conversation · Deliberation · Engineering ethics · Facilitator · Forensic psychiatry · Moral dilemma · Political science · Psychiatry · Relevance (law · Ethics in medical practice · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Law · Medicine · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Psychology · Social Psychology

• How Moral Case Deliberation Supports Good Clinical Decision Making

  Open Access•Giulia Inguaggiato, Suzanne Metselaar et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2019

  Incluir item

• Clinical Ethics Support Services Are Not as Well-Established in Forensic Psychiatry as in General Psychiatry

  Open Access•Irina Franke, Oskar Speiser et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2020

  Incluir item