Evaluating the efficacy of three classical EEG paradigms in the discrimination of bipolar depression

Dados Bibliográficos

ID15519603
AutoresChen Yang (0000-0002-4801-4036, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Yao Pi (0009-0006-2385-2515, Sun Yat-sen University), Weijie Wang (0000-0001-6997-5752, Sun Yat-sen University), Ying Huang (0000-0003-3569-7576, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University), Nan Tang (0000-0001-9702-8402, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital), Hong Wang (0000-0003-2405-7311, Sun Yat-sen University, autor correspondente), Shenglin Wen (Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Volume16
Páginas1545132-1545132
Data de publicação2025-05-29
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditoraFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1545132
PMID40511454
OpenAlexW4410856737
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas67

This study indicates that the eyes closed experimental paradigm more effectively demonstrates the electrophysiological disparities between patients with BD and HCs, in comparison to the eyes open paradigm and the action observation-based free viewing paradigms, as determined through the analysis of various outcome metrics

Bipolar disorder · Cognitive psychology · Depression (economics · Electroencephalography · Mood · Psychiatry · Bipolar Disorder and Treatment · Clinical Psychology · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology