Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in China

Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Trait Structure and Continuity With Personality Disorder Types

Dados Bibliográficos

ID15523600
AutoresShulin Fang (0000-0003-2820-8527, Central South University), Zirong Ouyang, Panwen Zhang (0000-0002-8696-2715, Central South University), Jiayue He (0000-0001-5756-6345, Central South University), Lejia Fan (0000-0003-4033-1050, Central South University), Xingwei Luo (0009-0008-0683-5224, Central South University), Jianghua Zhang (0000-0002-6734-3492, Central South University), Yan Xiong (0000-0003-0676-8267, Central South University), Fusheng Luo (0000-0001-7088-4727, Central South University of Forestry and Technology), Xiaosheng Wang (0000-0001-6668-8918, Central South University, autor correspondente), Shuqiao Yao (0000-0001-6681-6844, Central South University), Xiang Wang (0000-0002-2135-8576, Central South University, autor correspondente)
Ano2021
Volume12
Páginas635214-635214
Data de publicação2021-03-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoFrontiers in Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1664-0640 • E-ISSN: 1664-0640
EditoraFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635214
PMID33841206
OpenAlexW3149558766
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas52

The Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) is an established tool for assessing personality disorder (PD) traits that was developed based on section III of the DSM-5. It is composed of 220 items, organized into 25 facets, which are distributed among five domains. The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PID-5 remain to be demonstrated. Two samples were embodied in this study that included 3,550 undergraduates and 406 clinical patients. To probe the structure of the PID-5, parallel analyses were conducted to explore the unidimensionality of its 25 facets and a series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were carried out to confirm the 25 lower-order facets and their distribution among five higher-order domains. Then, the PID-5 was employed to measure the DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait models and to explore the relationship of DSM-IV categorical PDs with DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to probe how well DSM-IV categorical PDs correspond with maladaptive personality traits specified in the DSM-5 and five ICD-11 domains. The respective average internal reliability coefficients of the 25 facets obtained for undergraduate and clinical patient samples were 0.76 and 0.81, those obtained for the five DSM-5 domains were 0.89 and 0.91, and those obtained for the five ICD-11 domains were 0.87 and 0.89. Serial CFAs confirmed the rationality of the PID-5's lower-order 25-facet structure and higher-order five-domain structure in both samples. Correlation and regression analyses showed that DSM-5 specified traits explain the variance in PD presentation with a manifold stronger correlation ( R 2 = 0.24-0.44) than non-specified traits ( R 2 = 0.04-0.12). Overall, the PID-5 was shown to be a reliable, stable, and structurally valid assessment tool that captures pathological personality traits related to DSM-5 and ICD-11 PDs

Big Five personality traits · Categorical variable · DSM-5 · Facet (psychology · Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Personality disorders · Reliability (semiconductor · Statistics · Trait · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Personality Disorders and Psychopathology · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology