Political epidemiology
Strengthening socio-political analysis for mass immunisation – lessons from the smallpox and polio programmes
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15540343 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sebastian Taylor (University College London, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2009 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 546-560 |
| Data de publicação | 2009-04-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1744-1692 • E-ISSN: 1744-1706 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17441690701727850 |
| PMID | 19367477 |
| OpenAlex | W1992149858 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 10 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
Control and reduction of infectious diseases is a key to attaining the Millennium Development Goals. An important element of this work is the successful immunisation, especially in resource-poor countries. Mass immunisation, most intensively in the case of eradication, depends on a combination of reliable demand (e.g. public willingness to comply with the vaccine protocol) and effective supply (e.g. robust, generally state-led, vaccine delivery). This balance of compliance and enforceability is, quintessentially, socio-political in nature - conditioned by popular perceptions of disease and risk, wider conditions of economic development and poverty, technical aspects of vaccine delivery, and the prevailing international norms regarding power relations between states and peoples. In the past 100 years, three out of six disease eradication programmes have failed. The explanations for failure have focused on biotechnical and managerial or financial issues. Less attention is paid to socio-political aspects. Yet socio-political explanations are key. Eradication is neither inherently prone to failure, nor necessarily doomed in the case of polio. However, eradication, and similar mass immunisation initiatives, which fail to address social and political realities of intervention may be. A comparison of the smallpox and polio eradication programmes illustrates the importance of disease-specific socio-political analysis in programme conceptualisation, design, and management
Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Poliomyelitis · Poliomyelitis eradication · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Public health · Smallpox · Vaccination · Law · Medicine · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy · Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology · Virology and Viral Diseases · Immunology · Virology
Increasing Vaccination
The effects of polio eradication efforts on health systems
Fighting Covid-19 in China’s Greater Bay Area
The historical roots and seminal research on health equity
Culture and behaviour in mass health interventions
School building design for feeding programmes and community outreach
In pursuit of zero
Endgame for polio eradication? Options for overcoming social and political factors in the progress to eradicating polio
Parallel Dilemmas
Politicized disease surveillance
Rural Development
Bodily Matters
World Eradication of Infectious Diseases
Uncertain Advances
Ethical dilemmas in current planning for polio eradication
Polio vaccines—“no thank you!” barriers to polio eradication in Northern Nigeria
Intimidation, coercion and resistance in the final stages of the South Asian Smallpox Eradication Campaign, 1973-1975
Power Shift
| Obras citantes distintas | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,63 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2025 (16) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 10 |