Two dogmas of peer-reviewism
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 15736282 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lambros Roumbanis (0000-0002-5118-4124, Stockholm University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Fascículo | sup2 |
| Páginas | S129-S133 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-12-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Responsible Innovation (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2329-9037 • E-ISSN: 2329-9460 |
| Editora | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23299460.2020.1855806 |
| OpenAlex | W3115436195 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 10 |
How should we organize our research activities, and to what extent do we want academic culture to be shaped by funding issues? These are not trivial questions. We all want to support excellent rese
Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Peer review · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions · Engineering · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Chance and Consensus in Peer Review
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier
The lottery in Babylon—On the role of chance in scientific success
Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants
New Light on Old Boys
The Drawbacks of Project Funding for Epistemic Innovation
A Sociology of Luck
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |